RESEARCH ARTICLE


Are the Estimates of Catastrophic Health Expenditure Among Rural Population too High? A Comparison of Studies in Vietnam



Nguyen Thi Bich Thuan1, 2, *, Curt Lofgren2, Nguyen Thi Kim Chuc 3, Lars Lindholm 2
1 Planning and Financing Department, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam
2 Umeå International School of Public Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
3 Public Health Faculty, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
2
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 219
Abstract HTML Views: 352
PDF Downloads: 317
Total Views/Downloads: 888
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 152
Abstract HTML Views: 241
PDF Downloads: 255
Total Views/Downloads: 648



Creative Commons License
Thuan et al.; Licensee Bentham Open

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Planning and Financing Department, Ministry of Health, Hanoi, Vietnam; E-mails: ntbthuan2007@gmail.com


Abstract

Objectives:

To describe the proportion of the households that experienced catastrophic health expenditure and to compare the magnitude of catastrophic health expenditure that is estimated from three different data sets in Vietnam.

Methods:

The study we are comparing with is based on data from the Vietnam Living Standard Survey (VLSS) 1997/98. We have used data from the 2001 re-survey. The FilaBavi sample consists of 11,089 households. We have also conducted a special survey from July 2001 to June 2002. The sample is smaller, 629 households, but they have been followed for an entire year with monthly interviews. For VLSS and FilaBavi, re-census survey households were interviewed once with a recall period of one month.

Findings:

In the VLSS data and in the FilaBavi re-census survey it was found that 9%-10% of the households experienced catastrophic healthcare spending. But, only 5% (average per month) and 1% (for the whole year) of the households in the special survey report catastrophic spending.

Conclusions:

We suggest that the major reason for the difference in the estimates is the different data collection methods. When doing a cross sectional study with a relatively short recall period there is a risk that households will tend to overestimate non-recurrent large expenditures as that for health.

Keywords: Out-of-pocket payment, catastrophic health expenditure, households, Vietnam.