RESEARCH ARTICLE


Causal and Predictive Learning Based on Normative Contextualization: The Relevance Relativization Model



Manuel-Miguel Ramos-Alvarez1, *, Andres Catena2
1 Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, Spain
2 Departamento de Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Granada, Spain


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 890
Abstract HTML Views: 1514
PDF Downloads: 603
Total Views/Downloads: 3007
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 509
Abstract HTML Views: 884
PDF Downloads: 439
Total Views/Downloads: 1832



Creative Commons License
© 2010 Ramos-Álvarez and Catena.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode). This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Departamento de Psicología, Universidad de Jaén, Spain; Tel: +34 953212587; Fax: +34 953211881; E-mail: mramos@ujaen.es


Abstract

We present a model aimed at accounting for learning of predictive and causal relationships involving stimulus compounds, by means of a mechanism based on a normative-methodological analysis of causality that goes beyond the traditional associative/rule-based controversy. According to the model, causal learning is attained by computing the validity of each stimulus in a given learning situation. The situation is determined by the assumptions, objectives, and aims held by the learner or demanded by the learning context. Hence, validity computation depends on task demands: causal, predictive, or diagnostic according to a general principle of normative contextualization that allows learners to adapt a between-cues competition principle in a flexible way. Validity is computed using the Relevance Relativization mechanism, a linear model, based on the balance between the probability of stimulus combinations and the probability of each cue. Thus, cue interactions occur mainly when the combination of stimuli shows predictive changes in relation to the same cues considered individually. This model makes novel predictions concerning variations of the competition principle as a function of the type of procedure, including blocking, simultaneous blocking, and relative validity. In addition, our model also integrates top-down and bottom-up processing levels, including individuals' assumptions or previous beliefs.

Keywords: Causal and predictive learning, cue competition effects, predictive validity computation, theory-driven processing.