RESEARCH ARTICLE


Differences in Determinants of Indirect Perpetrator and Victim Behaviour



Marzanna Farnicka*
University of Zielona Góra, Institute of Psychology, Zielona Gora, Poland


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 3820
Abstract HTML Views: 2434
PDF Downloads: 1120
ePub Downloads: 631
Total Views/Downloads: 8005
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 2119
Abstract HTML Views: 1190
PDF Downloads: 762
ePub Downloads: 423
Total Views/Downloads: 4494



Creative Commons License
© Marzanna Farnicka; Licensee Bentham Open

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the University of Zielona Góra, Institute of Psychology, Zielona Gora, Poland; Tel: 0048500243681; E-mail: m.farnicka@wpps.uz.zgora.pl


Abstract

Background:

Studies on young children indicate that victims of indirect peer aggression often terminate their relations with the perpetrators. This study is based on the social learning and learning theory approach. In this case adolescence is treated in a special period of changes in social functioning.

Objective:

The study presents specific determinants of indirect type of perpetrator and victim behaviour in adolescence. The study analyses the following determinants: aggressiveness, attachment and temperament.

Method:

The respondents’ behaviour was measured with the self – assessment questionnaires: Mini DIA (Österman The Mini Inventory of Direct and Indirect Aggression, 2010), IPPA (Armsden, Greenberg Attachment scale, 1987), EAS (Buss, Plomin Temperament scale, 1997) and BPAQ (Buss, Perry Aggression Questionnaire, 1992).

The sample consisted of 160 secondary school students aged between 16 and 19. There were 82 girls (60%) and 78 boys (40%) in the studied population. The study was conducted in groups during a one-hour session.

Results:

The research results indicated the significance of the nature of attachment (mother alienation) for the undertaken risky behaviour of both perpetrator-type and victim-type. The differences relate to the type of relationship with parents (secure or insecure pattern), own experience of being in the role of victim or perpetrator, and the level of hostility. A separate model of determining factors for indirect type of aggressive behaviour was also demonstrated.

Conclusion:

In the light of the presented results, the proper diagnostic process seems important in order to differentiate between the assumed roles (aggressor/victim) and to apply suitable measures. In the case of indirect-type aggressors, the focus should be on coping with hostility, self-control and emotional control skills and working on alternative ways of functioning in the family (particularly in the relationship with mother).

Keywords: Aggression, Adolescence, Attachment, Temperament.