Staff Perception of Respect for Human Rights of Users and Organizational Well-being: A Study in Four Different Countries of the Mediterranean Area

Table 2: Comparison by country of scores on the quality rights assessment tool

All data: Mean (Standard deviation)	Italy	Macedonia	Palestine	Tunisia	ANOVA	Effect size
-	N = 126	N = 100	N = 164	N = 200	-	-
Staff’s satisfaction with job	4.1 (1.1)^a	3.4 (1.4)^b	3.7 (1.3)^b,c	3.9 (1.6)^a,c	F(3;586)=5.80, p=0.001	η²= 0.029
Users’ satisfaction with care	4.3 (1.0)^a	3.9 (1.3)^a,b	3.9 (1.3)^b	3.7 (1.6)^b	F(3;586)=4.71, p=0.003	η²= 0.024
Staff’s satisfaction with organization	3.6 (1.2)^a	3.6 (1.3)^a	3.7 (1.3)^a	3.1 (1.6)^b	F(3;586)=6.57, p<0.0001	η²= 0.033
Respect of users’ human rights	4.9 (1.2)^a	4.2 (1.3)^b,d	3.6 (1.5)^c	3.8 (1.7)^c,d	F(3;586)=21.9, p<0.0001	η²= 0.101
Respect of staff’s human rights	4.1 (1.2)^a	4.3 (1.4)^a	4.0 (1.4)^a	2.4 (1.6)^b	F(3;586)=59.4, p<0.0001	η²= 0.233
Staff’s satisfaction with resources for care	2.6 (0.8)^a	2.0 (1.6)^b	2.9 (1.3)^a	2.1 (0.9)^b	F(3;586)=23.2, p<0.0001	η²= 0.106

^a,b,c,d Games-Howell p<0.05; groups with the same superscript letter do not differ from each other
Participants from Italy reported, on average, the highest scores across the questions.