Influence of Finishing/Polishing Procedures on the Surface Texture of Two Resin Composites

Table 3: Effect of Finishing/Polishing Procedures on Gloss Value (Gs(60^°)) of Each Resin Composites (Mean and SD, %)

Composite/Finishing/Polishing Group^{^*}	AP-X	Statistics^{^**}	ES
Control	88.9 (3.5) A	NS	81.4 (4.0) a
SF SF+CM	2.3 (0.1) B 2.7 (0.3) B	NS S	7.7 (1.7) e 48.5 (15.9) bcd
SF+WP SF+WP+CM	11.6 (2.0) B 11.5 (18.8) B	S S	32.0 (8.3) d 53.6 (9.5) bc
SF+SB SF+SB+CM	5.9 (1.3) B 3.7 (1.3) B	S S	38.6 (9.4) cd 60.6 (8.6) b

^* SF: superfine diamond bur, CM: CompoMaster, WP: White Point CA, SB: Stainbuster.

^** Statistically analysis between AP-X and ES (p=0.05).

S: significantly different,NS: no statistically different.Values with the same letter are not significantly different in same composite (p<0.05).