RESEARCH ARTICLE


Etiological Agents of Urinary Tract Infection and 7 Years Trend of Antibiotic Resistance of Bacterial Uropathogens in Sudan



Doua Saad1, *, Sara Gameel1, Salma Ahmed1, Esraa Basha1, Mudather Osman2, Eltahir Khalil1
1 Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
2 Elzhrawi Laboratory, Khartoum, Sudan


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
2
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 4247
Abstract HTML Views: 1339
PDF Downloads: 760
ePub Downloads: 425
Total Views/Downloads: 6771
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1933
Abstract HTML Views: 551
PDF Downloads: 565
ePub Downloads: 255
Total Views/Downloads: 3304



Creative Commons License
© 2020 Saad et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan; Tel: 0024922530359; E-mail: dmsaadpeace1991@gmail.com


Abstract

Introduction:

Bacterial infections of the urinary tract represent a major cause of outpatient visits as well as hospital-acquired infections. As the prevalence of multidrug-resistant uropathogens is increasing, updated knowledge of the commonest bacterial causes and their susceptibility patterns is crucial for the proper selection and use of antimicrobial drugs and the development of effective local prescribing guidelines.

Methods:

Handling of urine samples, identification of organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were made according to guidelines in Monica Cheesbrough 2000, 2006. The prevalence of resistance of the pathogens against each antibiotic was calculated as the proportion of resistant isolates over the entire tested isolates. Data were analyzed using Epi info; the chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to assess the statistical significance of results.

Results:

In this study, 774 samples were cultured from patients with suspected urinary tract infection (UTI), 705 (91%) urinary isolates showed significant growth (>105 CFU /L) while the other 69 samples showed no significant growth. 431 (61%) of the patients were female, while the other 274 (39%) were males. 13 types of pathogens were identified in 705 urinary isolates. E.Coli was the main bacterial uropathogen identified. Microbiological susceptibility of a total of 28 antibiotics was tested; for each urinary isolate, different sets of these antibiotics were used. 601(96%) of the bacteria were resistant to at least one antibiotic. 17 antibiotics were found to have a bacterial resistance rate of more than 50%, including all B lactams (except cefuroxime), Nalidixic acid, Ciprofloxacin, Norfloxacin, Clindamycin, Co-Trimoxazole and Tetracyclines(Tetracycline and Doxycycline). Other antibiotics were found to have resistance rates of less than 50%. Amikacin & Imipenem had the highest susceptibility rates. Throughout the 7 years, resistance to most of the antibiotics showed an incremental pattern.

Conclusion:

Current empirical antibiotic therapy for UTI should be modified, and new guidelines should be established based on local resistance rates. This study comes up with precious regional data for evidence-based empirical antibiotic treatment, but a national sentinel surveillance system and regional antibiograms should be established to track the bacterial susceptibility profiles in Sudan.

Keywords: Multidrug-resistant uropathogens, Monica Cheesbrough 200, ESBL producing organisms, 7 years trend, Two centers in Khartoum, UTI pathogens within Sudan.



1. INTRODUCTION

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is defined as the colonization of the urinary tract by microbial pathogens. UTIs could be categorized by various methods, anatomically into lower (cystitis), upper (pyelonephritis), or prostatitis. It also can be symptomatic UTI or asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB). “Uncomplicated” UTI occurs in a normal genitourinary tract with no history of instrumentation while infection in genitourinary tracts that have anatomical, physiological abnormalities or catheterization, is considered “complicated”. [1-3] Bacterial pathogens are the major cause of UTI, accounting for 95% of cases [4].

Analysis of clean-catch urine is commonly used to detect UTIs using rapid screening tests (dipstick leukocyte esterase test or nitrite test) or microscopic examination. Notably, the detection of pyuria is not specific and is not always evidence of clinical UTI. Urine culture is the gold standard test but is not approved for managing uncomplicated lower UTI, such as cystitis. On the other hand, a urine culture and sensitivity test should be obtained for acute pyelonephritis and any type of complicated UTIs, before empiric therapy to optimize the subsequent definitive antibiotic regimen [5].

UTIs are one of the most prevailing bacterial infections with a global incidence of 150 million people /year [6-8]. UTIs have large socio-economic impacts as it ranks the No.1 infection that leads to antibacterial drug consumption [9, 10]. Women are more affected as about 10% of females in the United States have at least one incident of symptomatic UTI each year. Almost 60% of women have one or more symptomatic UTIs during their lifespan [5].

A worldwide emerging epidemic of antimicrobial resistance is observed in varying contexts, increasing the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection, extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing organisms, and completely pan-resistant gram-negative bacilli [11-14]. Multidrug-resistant pathogens are considered a real risk to community health with a high impact on morbidity and mortality. As a result, infectious diseases still rate the second cause of global mortality despite the availability of antibiotics [15]. Our misuse of antibiotics will apply selective pressure increasing the numbers of resistant strains, particularly in developing countries [16, 17].

In Sudan, bacterial infections of the urinary tract represent a major cause of outpatient visits as well as hospital-acquired infections. The prevalence of multidrug-resistant uropathogens in Sudan is increasing, making currently used empirical therapeutic regimens suboptimal [18, 19]. An important causative factor of this is the patient’s intentional behavior of self-treatment by antibiotics [20]. Sudan, a developing country with limited resources, allocates a considerable amount of its health-payments to buy drugs, especially antibiotics. Updated knowledge of the commonest bacterial causes and their susceptibility patterns is crucial for the proper selection and use of antimicrobial drugs and the development of effective local prescribing guidelines. Moreover, they are important for the physicians in far rural areas who may not have facilities of microbiology laboratory set-up and, therefore, must rely on their knowledge of antibiotic-resistant rates. While antimicrobial resistance surges, the expenditure of treating infections will increase as more costly antimicrobial agents are needed to reach clinical and laboratory cure. Temporal and local variables can modify these policies, so they need to be constantly re-evaluated [21-23].

Unluckily, there is no available profound information on the etiology and resistance pattern of UTIs in Sudan. Many cases are observed to be resistant to conventional chemotherapy in clinical practice. Within Sudan, the majority of community-acquired UTIs are managed on an empirical basis without testing the susceptibility of detected UTI pathogens. The insufficient community-specific microbiological data stands against the ability to recommend effective first-line therapy for UTI.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective facility-based study that was conducted in two centers in Khartoum-Sudan, the microbiology section of Elzhrawi laboratory and the microbiology section of Khartoum teaching hospital throughout seven years period (2009-2015). Elzahrawi is a referral laboratory that receives referred outpatients or inpatients from outside and within Khartoum state.

Handling of urine samples, identification of organisms, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were made according to guidelines in Monica Cheesbrough 2000, 2006. Clean catch specimens were collected by instructing patients with suspected UTI to wash the hands, cleanse the area around the urethral opening with clean water and collect midstream urine with as little contamination as possible. 10-20 ml urine specimens were collected in sterile containers. Then the containers were labeled with the patient’s name, number and date of collection.

Urine culture was done on blood agar, Mackonkey agar or Cystine lactose electrolyte-deficient (CLED) agar using a calibrated standard loop then incubated at 35-37 °C overnight. The number of (CFU) per ml of more than 105/ml was regarded as significant bacteriuria. Identification of organisms was made by performing gram staining of suspected colonies; confirmatory identification was made using different biochemical tests. Results are interpreted as described in the guidelines mentioned in Monica Cheesbrough 2000, 2006.

Susceptibility testing was carried out by the disc diffusion method, as described in detail in Monica Cheesbrough 2000, 2006. Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 are used as control strains. A plate of Mueller Hinton agar was used for inoculation; in 30 minutes of applying the discs, aerobic incubation was performed for 16-18 hours at a temperature of 35 °C.

Due to the relatively long period of the study, different sets of antibiotic discs are used to test the susceptibility of different pathogens. Antimicrobials tested are Ampicillin 10 mcg, Cloxacillin 5 mcg, penicillin 10 Units, Ampicillin/Sulbactam 20 mcg, Methicillin 5 mcg, Cefotaxime 30 mcg, Ceftazidime 30 mcg, Ceftriaxone 30 mcg, Cefuroxime 30 mcg, Cephalexin 30 mcg, Chloramphenicol 30 mcg, Clindamycin 2 mcg, Ciprofloxacin 5 mcg, Vancomycin 30 mcg, Co-Trimoxazole 25 mcg, Gentamycin 10 mcg, Nitrofurantoin 300 mcg, Tetracycline 30 mcg, Amikacin 30 mcg, Erythromycin 15 mcg, Ofloxacin 30 mcg, Sparfloxacin 5 mcg, Doxycycline 30 mcg, Gatifloxacin 5 mcg, Imipenem 10 mcg, Norfloxacin 10 mcg, Nalidixic acid 30 mcg, Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 30 mcg. Antibiotic discs were obtained from Axiom & HIMEDIA.

The prevalence of resistance of the pathogens against each antibiotic was calculated as the proportion of resistant isolates over the entire tested isolates. Data were analyzed using Epi info; the chi-square test was used to assess the statistical significance of results (when >20% of the cells have expected values <5, then Fisher exact test was used). Results with Probability values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Ethical approval and informed consent were not needed for this study because it is a retrospective study.

3. RESULTS

In this study, 774 samples were cultured from patients with suspected UTI, 705 (91%) urinary isolates showed significant growth (>105 CFU /L) while the other 69 samples showed no significant growth. 431 (61%) of the patients were female, while the other 274(39%) were males.

13 types of pathogens were identified in 705 urinary isolates. Gram-negative bacteria were the major isolates (Fig. 1). E.Coli was the main bacterial uropathogen followed by S.aureus, Pseudomonas, and Klebsiella (Table 1).

There was a significant difference between males and females regarding the causative organism of UTI with a P-value of 0.0087. E.coli, S.aureus & candida spp were found to cause a higher proportion of infections in females, Proteus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were equal in both genders while the other types of pathogens were more in males (Table 2).

After the exclusion of Candida, the 624 isolates were tested for antimicrobial resistance. Microbiological susceptibility of a total of 28 antibiotics was tested; for each urinary isolate, different sets of these antibiotics were used. 601(96%) of the bacteria were resistant to at least one antibiotic. 17 antibiotics were found to have a bacterial resistance rate of more than 50%, including all B lactams except Cefurixime, Nalidixic acid, Ciprofloxacin, Norfloxacin Clindamycin, Co-Trimoxazole, and Tetracyclines (Tetracycline& Doxycycline). Other antibiotics were found to have resistance rates of less than 50%. Amikacin & Imipenem had the highest susceptibility rates. Stratified by gender, microbiological resistance to Cloxacillin, Penicillin, Ampicillin/Sulbactam, Cefuroxime, Cephalexin, Vancomycin, Erythromycin, Norfloxacin was found to be significantly higher in females compared to males (P-value<0.05). The mean of microbiological resistance to antibiotics in males was 55.08% compared to 60.54% in females.

In terms of specified treatment depending on Gram-stain morphology, our study suggests that Amikacin, Gatifloxacin & Ceftriaxone are the best parenteral antibiotics for confirmed gram-positive UTI while the best oral options were Nitrofurantoin & Ofloxacin. Gram-negative infections may be treated best with Vancomycin, Imipenem, Amikacin, Gatifloxacin & nitrofurantoin. There was a significant difference (P-value<0.05) in antimicrobial resistance of the two-gram stain morphotypes against several antibiotics (Table 3).

Imipenem was the most potent antibiotic in this study with a low rate of resistance (less than 6%), Enterococci was exceptionally resistant (60%). Ceftriaxone & Cefurexime resistance rates were variable among bacteria; S.aureus & Pseudomonas show exceptional sensitivity. Klebsiella spp & Pseudomonas were resistant to Nitrofurantoin, whereas E.coli, S.aureus, Enterococci were sensitive. Overall sensitivity to Gentamycin was high; Klebsiella & Enterococci were less sensitive. While all types of bacteria show reasonable sensitivity to Ofloxacin & Sparfloxacin, Klebsiella was highly resistant to them. Amoxicillin clavulanic acid had a low susceptibility rate except for Enterococci & Proteus (Table 4).

Table 1. Number (percentage) of urinary pathogens with a comparison between males and females.
Gender S.aureus E.Coli Klebsiella spp Candida spp Enterococci Pseudomonas spp Proteus spp CNS others Total
Male 53(19) 67(24) 27(10) 28(10) 24(9) 33(12) 1(1) 13(5) 28(10) 274
Female 85(20) 153(35) 33(8) 53(12) 29(7) 28(6) 6(1) 20(5) 24(6) 431
Total 138(20) 220(31) 60(9) 81(11) 53(7) 61(9) 7(1) 33(5) 52(7) 705
Table 2. Resistance (%) of urinary isolates to commonly used antimicrobial agents, with a comparison between males & females.
Antibiotic Resistance in males Resistance in females Total resistance P-value
Ampicillin 61(88) 93(91) 154(90) 0.66
Ampicillin/Sulbactam 59(81) 137(88) 196(86) 0.01
penicillin 25(71) 30(97) 55(83) 0.001
Cloxacillin 12(75) 14(82) 26(79) 0.01
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 38(79) 60(73) 98(75) 0.63
Methicillin 9(60) 18(72) 27(67) 0.49
Cephalexin 50(78) 110(79) 160(78) 0.003
Cefotaxime 26(68) 40(77) 66(73) 0.52
Ceftazidime 44(71) 52(66) 96(68) 0.17
Ceftriaxone 13(50) 27(54) 40(53) 0.61
Cefuroxime 1(17) 13(57) 14(48) 0.04
Co-Trimoxazole 143(79) 265(83) 408(82) 0.07
Doxycycline 13(81) 15(79) 28(80) 0.44
Tetracycline 125(69) 176(72) 301(70) 0.14
Clindamycin 67(81) 86(72) 153(76) 0.12
Nalidixic acid 31(74) 57(70) 88(72) 0.24
Norfloxacin 78(54) 174(65) 252(61) 0.02
Ciprofloxacin 74(52) 126(57) 200(55) 0.67
Sparfloxacin 22(43) 56(47) 77(46) 0.11
Ofloxacin 29(36) 60(38) 89(37) 0.11
Gatifloxacin 7(19) 15(22) 22(21) 0.71
Vancomycin 8(40) 10(59) 18(49) 0.04
Erythromycin 13(34) 20(63) 33(47) 0.002
Nitrofurantoin 26(35) 52(36) 78(36) 0.27
Chloramphenicol 52(38) 70(33) 122(35) 0.17
Gentamycin 60(45) 82(45) 142(45) 0.14
Amikacin 16(18) 27(13) 43(14) 0.14
Imipenem 1(3) 3(8) 4(6) 0.09
Table 3. Number(%) of resistance of gram stain morphotypes to commonly used antibiotics.
Antibiotic Resistance in GBB Resistance in GNB P-value
Ampicillin 28(80) 126(93) 0.08
Ampicillin/Sulbactam 81(89) 115(85) 0.52
penicillin 35(76) 20(100) 0.06
Cloxacillin 14(78) 12(80) 0.14
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 24(55) 74(86) 0.0004
Methicillin 25(69) 2(100) Fisher exact 0.54
Cephalexin 64(70) 96(86) 0.03
Cefotaxime 26(72) 39(74) 0.29
Ceftazidime 21(72) 75(67) 0.33
Ceftriaxone 4(25) 36(60) 0.03
Cefuroxime 4(44) 10(50) 0.89
Co-Trimoxazole 128(77) 279(85) 0.09
Doxycycline 4(67) 24(83) 0.48
Tetracycline 92(63) 207(74) 0.02
Clindamycin 68(83) 84(71) 0.16
Nalidixic acid 41(80) 47(65) 0.15
Norfloxacin 79(56) 172(64) 0.03
Ciprofloxacin 64(52) 136(57) 0.73
Sparfloxacin 29(44) 49(48) 0.44
Ofloxacin 30(31) 59(42) 0.02
Gatifloxacin 10(20) 12(22) 0.77
Vancomycin 16(57) 2(22) 0.02
Erythromycin 23(46) 10(50) 0.75
Nitrofurantoin 19(28) 59(39) 0.04
Chloramphenicol 43(39) 79(33) 0.27
Gentamycin 43(47) 99(45) 0.91
Amikacin 21(19) 22(12) 0.28
Imipenem 3(60) 1(2) 0


Table 4. Number (%) of resistant isolates of main identified uropathogenes.
Antibiotic S.aureus E.Coli Klebsiella spp Pseudomonas CNS Enterococci Proteus spp
Ampicillin 14(74) 65(94) 19(100) 6(75) 4(80) 13(76) 1(100)
Ampicillin/Sulbactam 63(89) 62(83) 28 (93) 21(84) 14(88) 1(100) 4(67)
penicillin 17(74) 10(100) 1 (100) 5(100) 2(40) 18 (90) NT
Cloxacillin 10(77) 7(100) 2(100) 3(50) 3(75) NT NT
Amoxicillin/clav 14(70) 46(90) 12 (100) 7(88) 3(50) 5(29) 0
Methicillin 19 (76) 2(100) NT NT 5(45) 1(50) NT
Cephalexin 50(68) 52(81) 22(88) 17(94) 10(71) 1(100) 5(100)
Cefotaxime 19(73) 16(84) 8(62) 10 (77) 3(50) 3 (100) NT
Ceftazidime 13(59) 46(74) 10(77) 12(48) 3(100) 4 (80) NT
Ceftriaxone 2(22) 25(60) 5(100) 0 0 4(50) NT
Cefuroxime 2(40) 10(63) 1(50) 0 0 1(100) NT
Co-Trimoxazole 87(76) 161(88) 44(85) 41 (93) 22(79) 17(71) 4(67)
Doxycycline 1(50) 16(89) 4(80) 1(100) 1(100) 2(66) NT
Tetracycline 65(65) 119(76) 33(72) 35(80) 8(35) 19(76) 5(100)
Clindamycin 47(84) 48(73) 12(55) 15(83) 7(78) 16(89) 0
Nalidixic acid 28(85) 22 (67) 6(55) 7(100) 1(50) 12 (80) 1(50)
Norfloxacin 60(67) 110(74) 25(61) 12 (43) 6(29) 16(49) 2(28)
Ciprofloxacin 49(56) 91(65) 24(62) 13(33) 7(32) 7(58) 0
Sparfloxacin 24(46) 28(46) 13(65) 5(31) 0 0 2(40)
Ofloxacin 26(33) 34(45) 19(55) 4(17) 3(18) 0 2(40)
Gatifloxacin 9(22) 5(17) 3(23) 3(30) 0 0 1(50)
Vancomycin 4(40) 0 NT NT NT 14 (54) NT
Erythromycin 13(54) 5(71) 1(100) 1(20) 1(20) 12(46) NT
Nitrofurantoin 13(26) 18(20) 16(67) 12(71) 3(38) 1(11) 2(40)
Chloramphenicol 29(37) 34(25) 15(35) 21(58) 9(60) 4(22) 4(80)
Gentamycin 23(45) 53(42) 19(68) 8(28) 3(17) 21(72) NT
Amikacin 12(17) 15(13) 6(14) 4(13) 2(14) 1(100) 0
Imipenem 0 1(3) 0 0 NT 3(60) NT

Throughout the 7 years, resistance to most of the antibiotics showed an incremental pattern. On the other hand, resistance against Aminoglycosides, Erythromycin, and 3rd generation Cephalosporins (Ceftazidime, Cefotaxime and Ceftriaxone) were significantly decreased. Tetracycline, Ofloxacin, Ampicillin & Cloxacillin resistance rates slightly decreased at the end of the study compared to the start. (Figs. 2, 3).

Fig. (1). Main types of pathogens identified from urinary isolates.
*Others include Salmonella typhi, Enterobacter spp., Streptococcus viridians, Difthoid spp., Citrobacter spp.

Fig. (2). Trend of antimicrobial resistance throughout 7 years period from 2009-2015, the figure includes antimicrobial agents that showed an upward trend.

Fig. (3). Trend of antimicrobial resistance throughout the 7 years period from 2009-2015, the figure includes antimicrobial agents that showed a downward trend.

4. DISCUSSION

The high proportion of culture-positive samples seen in this study (91%) compared to previous studies may be due to urine culture being non-routine investigation in Sudan, and in most of the cases, it was done after positive indicators of infection in urine analysis [24]. Most of the samples were from female patients; this is due to the higher incidence of UTI among females because of structural differences, including the shorter urethra and the presence of physiological vaginal discharge leading to the moist periurethral area [25, 26].

Most pathogens were Gram-negative bacilli (about 60%) and E.coli is the dominant pathogenic bacteria; this finding is concordant to previous studies done in different parts of the world [24, 27-30]. Other dominant pathogens isolated in this study were Enterococcus faecalis(6.52%), Staphylococcus aureus(19.57%), Proteus spp(0.99%), Klebsiella spp(8.51%), Pseudomonas spp(8.65%), these bacteria were isolated in other study at rates of 19%, 13%, 4%, 4% and 3% respectively [31]. In addition to this study, recent studies have reported the increasing prevalence of S.aureus in UTIs [32-34].

The overall resistance rate of bacterial pathogens to antimicrobial drugs was remarkably high in this study, parallel to the results of previous studies done in Sudan [31, 35]. Multiple factors have increased the prevalence of antibiotic resistance, including the high consumption of antibiotics due to the increased incidence of infectious diseases, selective prescribing due to the effect of promotional pursuits of pharmaceutical corporations, lack of diagnostic laboratory facilities and physicians, particularly in remote areas, and the challenges in distributing data regarding antibiotic susceptibility. Another important causative factor in Sudan is the patient’s intentional behavior of self-treatment by antibiotics [20].

Heavily prescribed antibiotics and medications inappropriately used by the community like B lactams, Cotrimoxazole, Ciprofloxacin, Doxycycline were found to have high rates of bacterial resistance due to selection power on the bacterial population leading to the survival of the most resistant bacteria which have acquired methods of counteracting their mechanisms of action [36, 37]. In addition, the 7 years trend of resistance against them was incremental, indicating the problem is still in progress and ringing the bell toward putting strict strategies for an antibiotics prescription.

Various antibiotics with high susceptibility rates like Chloramphenicol & Gatifloxacin have severe side effects making the challenge of choosing drugs more difficult [38]. Besides, most of these antibiotics are available only for the parenteral route, increasing the number of hospital admission, which is in a developing country like Sudan, is far difficult and costly.

Ampicillin was the least efficacious antimicrobial agent, as only 10% of all tested isolates were sensitive to it. This finding is similar to other studies, where only 37% were sensitive to ampicillin [39]. Co-Trimoxazole (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) was among the least effective drugs, and its antimicrobial resistance is increasing from about 50% in previous studies to about 82% in this study. In addition, resistance against Ciprofloxacin, Norfloxacin & Ceftriaxone was found to be higher in this study in comparison to previous surveys [24, 39]. As seen in other studies, UTI pathogens have higher resistance against amoxicillin/clavulanic acid when compared with fluoroquinolones [27].

According to their observed resistance rate in this study, Fluoroquinolones & Co-Trimoxazole should not be used as empirical treatment as the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommends a 10% & 20% resistance threshold for the treatment of urinary tract infections with fluoroquinolones & Co-Trimoxazole, above these rates these antimicrobial agents must not be administered for empirical therapy [40].

Although Cephalexin is commonly used in the outpatient setting for treating uncomplicated cystitis and ASB, it had a low susceptibility rate (21.5%), and as well it is not approved by the IDSA for the management of uncomplicated UTI [40].

In agreement with other studies, Imipenem & Amikacin showed the highest levels of susceptibility (94%)& (86%), respectively [39]. Susceptibility rates to Nitrofurantoin, Gentamicin, Cefuroxime remain above 50% but are decreasing from 77%, 88% & 90.1% before 2013 to 64%, 55% & 52% in this study [24, 39]. Resistance against Nitrofurantoin was relatively low (35.62%), also it is a well-tolerated oral antibiotic with a low potential for collateral damage. Therefore, it is proposed as one of the first-line antibiotics for the treatment of uncomplicated cystitis as well as chemo-prophylaxis in females with recurrent UTIs [41]. Conversely, it is not recommended the treatment of pyelonephritis because it does not achieve high concentration within the kidney’s parenchyma [42].

In agreement with a German study, gender Stratified prevalence of antimicrobial resistance was found to be generally lower among males than females [43]. The presence of this difference raises the importance of gender-stratified surveillance studies, which establish the basis of gender-specific empiric therapy.

The resistance of Klebsiella spp isolates against gentamycin in Sudan was increased from 40% in the year 2000 to 67.86% in this study [35]. In addition, resistance against 3rd generation cephalosporin and nalidixic acid was significantly increased in comparison to previous studies [31, 35, 39].

In recent years, highly antibiotic-resistant uropathogens, including ESBL producing organisms, arise as an important cause of community-acquired UTIs and healthcare-associated complicated UTIs [5]. In this study, more than 50% of isolated E.coli, klebsiella spp, coliform were resistant to all B lactams suggesting an ESBL production mechanism. Also, a study in India showed that the proportions of (ESBL)-positive isolates were 66%–77% in E. coli and 61%–72% in K. pneumoniae [44]. Based on this survey and in agreement with another study, carbapenems are the best agents to cure UTIs caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria such as ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae [45]. According to the guidelines of the European Association of Urology, this high rate of ESBL-producing E. coli necessitate the initial therapy of pyelonephritis should be with an Aminoglycoside or Carbapenem shifted to oral antibiotics based on susceptibility testing [46]. 76% of S.aureus was resistant to Methicillin(MRSA), a result comparable to other studies on which MRSA constitutes 86% of the S. aureus isolates [47]. Unfortunately, this finding is not a local problem, it is part of an emerging global epidemic of MRSA, especially within health care institutions [48, 49].

In contrast to other isolates, Enterococci were found to be resistant to Vancomycin and Imipenem. Although Carbapenems have outstanding bactericidal action against approximately all pathogenic bacteria, Enterococci are known to be intrinsically resistant to them, especially Enterococcus faecium [50]. From 2014 onwards, the proportions of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci(VRE) isolates increased from 11.2% in 2014 to 26.1% in 2017 [51]. In addition to enterococci, S.aurues has a resistance rate of 40% to Vancomycin; these findings put the treatment of UTI at great challenge because Imipenem and Vancomycin are one of the drugs of last resort and are used after treatment with other antibiotics have failed.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Gram-negative organisms were the main cause of UTI. Bacteria causing UTI in Sudan frequently develop resistance against 17 antimicrobial drugs, and thus, we emphasize a serious dilemma in front of the health system. Given rising antimicrobial resistance trends, appropriate use of antibiotics and the development of novel agents are important to face this problem. To invent novel antibiotics, it is vital to study antimicrobial resistance on a molecular basis so that we can avoid and defeat mechanisms of resistance.

For all suspected cases, a culture and sensitivity test has to be conducted before the initiation of empirical antibiotics therapy and then drugs should be adapted according to the results. Personal hygiene, as prevention and hydration, may replace the use of antibiotics in many cases. Current empirical antibiotic therapy for UTI should be modified, and new guidelines should be established based on local resistance rates. This study comes up with precious regional data for evidence-based empirical antibiotic treatment, but a national sentinel surveillance system and regional antibiograms should be established to track the bacterial susceptibility profiles in Sudan. As well, antimicrobial stewardship programs are essential to provide educational activities and issue the announcement of bacterial susceptibility rates to antibiotics with the ultimate goal of appropriate and cost-effective prescription behavior.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE

Not applicable.

HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS

Not applicable.

CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION

Not applicable.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIALS

Not applicable.

FUNDING

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank the research group for their hard and cooperative work, thanks to Elzahrawi laboratory, Khartoum teaching hospital ,to Professor Eltahir Khalil for his warmly granted helps and advices. Great acknowledgement to my family and my husband; Ammar Mandor for their support. Gratitude to the Open Microbiology Journal for their critical free advice on the manuscript.

REFRENCES

[1] Gonzalez CM, Schaeffer AJ. Treatment of urinary tract infection: what’s old, what’s new, and what works. World J Urol 1999; 17(6): 372-82. [ PubMed].
[2] Stamm WE, Hooton TM. Management of urinary tract infections in adults. N Engl J Med 1993; 329(18): 1328-34. [ PubMed].
[3] Coyle EA, Prince RA. Urinary tract infections and prostatitis.Pharmacotherapy: A pathophysiologic approach 10th ed. 2017. [ Links]
[4] Bishop BL, Duncan MJ, Song J, Li G, Zaas D, Abraham SN. Cyclic AMP-regulated exocytosis of Escherichia coli from infected bladder epithelial cells. Nat Med 2007; 13(5): 625-30. [PubMed]. [Google Scholar].
[5] Jack D. Sobel M.D. Donald Kaye M.D. Host factors in the pathogenesis of urinary tract infections Am J Med 1984; 76(5, Part 1): 122-30.
[6] Harding GK, Ronald AR. The management of urinary infections: what have we learned in the past decade? Int J Antimicrob Agents 1994; 4(2): 83-8. [PubMed]. [Google Scholar].
[7] Foxman B. Urinary tract infection syndromes: occurrence, recurrence, bacteriology, risk factors, and disease burden. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2014; 28(1): 1-13. [PubMed]. [Google Scholar].
[8] O’Brien VP, Hannan TJ, Nielsen HV, Hultgren SJ. Drug and vaccine development for the treatment and prevention of urinary tract infections. Microbiol Spectr 2016; 4(1): 4. [PMC free article]. [PubMed]. [Google Scholar].
[9] Abbo LM, Hooton TM. Antimicrobial stewardship and urinary tract infections. Antibiotics (Basel) 2014; 3(2): 174-92. [ PMC].
[10] Mobley HLT. Virulence of two primary uropathogens. ASM News 2000; 66: 403-10. [ Links ].
[11] Antimicrobial resistance: a growing threat to public health 2002. [Links]
[12] Chambers HF. Community-associated MRSA--resistance and virulence converge. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(14): 1485-7. [ PubMed].
[13] Rhomberg PR, Fritsche TR, Sader HS, Jones RN. Clonal occurrences of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: Report from the meropenem yearly susceptibility test information collection surveillance program in the united states (2004). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006; 54(4): 249-57. [PubMed].
[14] Pitout JD, Laupland KB. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis 2008; 8(3): 159-66. [Links].
[15] Deaths by cause, sex and mortality stratum in WHO regions, estimates for 2002: World Health Report—2004 2004. [ Links]
[16] Palumbi SR. Humans as the world’s greatest evolutionary force. Science 2001; 293(5536): 1786-90. [PubMed].
[17] Paterson DL. Resistance in gram-negative bacteria: enterobacteriaceae. Am J Med 2006; 119(6)(Suppl. 1): S20-8. [Links].
[18] Gupta K, Hooton TM, Stamm WE. Increasing antimicrobial resistance and the management of uncomplicated community-acquired urinary tract infections. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135(1): 41-50. [PubMed]. [Google Scholar].
[19] Al-Badr A, Al-Shaikh G. Recurrent urinary tract infections management in women: a review. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2013; 13(3): 359-67. [PMC free article]. [PubMed]. [Google Scholar].
[20] Okeke IN, Lamikanra A, Edelman R. Socioeconomic and behavioral factors leading to acquired bacterial resistance to antibiotics in developing countries. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5(1): 18-27. [Links].
[21] Magee JT, Pritchard EL, Fitzgerald KA, Dunstan FD, Howard AJ. Antibiotic prescribing and antibiotic resistance in community practice: retrospective study, 1996-8. BMJ 1999; 319(7219): 1239-40. [ Links ].
[22] Grüneberg RN. Changes in urinary pathogens and their antibiotic sensitivities, 1971-1992. J Antimicrob Chemother 1994; 33(Suppl. A): 1-8. [ Links ].
[23] Raz R, Okev N, Kennes Y, Gilboa A, Lavi I, Bisharat N. Demographic characteristics of patients with community-acquired bacteriuria and susceptibility of urinary pathogens to antimicrobials in northern Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2000; 2(6): 426-9. [ Links].
[24] Lewis DA, Gumede LY, van der Hoven LA, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of organisms causing community-acquired urinary tract infections in Gauteng Province, South Africa. S Afr Med J 2013; 103(6): 377-81. [PubMed }].
[25] Prais D, Straussberg R, Avitzur Y, Nussinovitch M, Harel L, Amir J. Bacterial susceptibility to oral antibiotics in community acquired urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88(3): 215-8. [ Links ].
[26] George AK, et al. “Asymptomatic urinary tract infections in pregnant women attending antenatal clinic in cape coast, Ghana”. E3. J Med Res 2012; 1(6): 74-83. [ Links].
[27] Hooton TM. Clinical practice. Uncomplicated urinary tract infection. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(11): 1028-37. [Links].
[28] Ladhani S, Gransden W. Increasing antibiotic resistance among urinary tract isolates. Arch Dis Child 2003; 88(5): 444-5. [ Links ].
[29] Andrews JM. The development of the BSAC standardized method of disc diffusion testing. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48(Suppl. 1): 29-42. [ Links ].
[30] Mangiarotti P, Pizzini C, Fanos V. Antibiotic prophylaxis in children with relapsing urinary tract infections: review. J Chemother 2000; 12(2): 115-23. [ Links ].
[31] Saeed A. Shadia A. Hamid, Magdi Bayoumi, Salah Shanan, Sultan Alouffi, Samir A. Alharbi, Fawaz D. Alshammari, and Hadi Abd Elevated antibiotic resistance of Sudanese urinary tract infection bacteria. EXCLI J 2017; 16: 1073-80. [PMC].
[32] Nwanze PI, Nwaru LM, Oranusi S, et al. Urinary tract infection in Okada village: prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility pattern. Sci Res Essays 2007; 2: 112-6. [Links].
[33] Akortha EE, Ibadin OK. Incidence and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Staphylococcus aureus amongst patients with urinary tract infection (UTIS) in UBTH Benin City, Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol 2008; 7: 1637-40. [ Links].
[34] Aboderin OA, Abdu AR, Odetoyin BW, Lamikanra A. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli strains from urinary tract infections. J Natl Med Assoc 2009; 101(12): 1268-73. [ PubMed].
[35] Ahmed AA, Osman H, Mansour AM, et al. Antimicrobial agent resistance in bacterial isolates from patients with diarrhea and urinary tract infection in the Sudan. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2000; 63(5-6): 259-63. [PubMed]. [Google Scholar].
[36] Urassa W, Lyamuya E, Mhalu F. Recent trends on bacterial resistance to antibiotics. East Afr Med J 1997; 74(3): 129-33. [PubMed].
[37] Ayliffe GAJ. 1970.Use of antibiotics and resistance.
[38] Lewis RJ, Mohr JF III. Dysglycaemias and fluoroquinolones. Drug Saf 2008; 31(4): 283-92. [ Links].
[39] Community acquired urinary tract infection: etiology and bacterial susceptibility 1 José Anastácio Dias Neto; Antonio Carlos Pereira Martins; Leonardo Dias Magalhães da Silva; Ricardo Brianezi Tiraboschi; André Luis Alonso Domingos; Adauto José Cologna; Edson Luis Paschoalin; Silvio Tucci JrIIActa Cir. Bras 2003; 18(suppl.5) {Google schoolar}.
[40] Gupta K, Hooton TM, Naber KG, et al. International clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of acute uncomplicated cystitis and pyelonephritis in women: A 2010 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the European Society for Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52(5): e103-20. [Links].
[41] Geerts AF, Eppenga WL, Heerdink R, et al. Ineffectiveness and adverse events of nitrofurantoin in women with urinary tract infection and renal impairment in primary care. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2013; 69(9): 1701-7. [ PubMed].
[42] Sanchez GV, Babiker A, Master RN, Luu T, Mathur A, Bordon J. Antibiotic resistance among urinary isolates from female outpatients in the United States in 2003 and 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2016; 60(5): 2680-3. [PubMed].
[43] Isenberg HD. Essential procedures for clinical microbiology 1998. [Links]
[44] Veeraraghavan B, Jesudason MR, Prakasah JAJ, et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of gram-negative bacteria causing infections collected across India during 2014-2016: Study for monitoring antimicrobial resistance trend report. Indian J Med Microbiol 2018; 36(1): 32-6. [PubMed].
[45] Yoon YK, Kim JH, Sohn JW, Yang KS, Kim MJ. Role of piperacillin/tazobactam as a carbapenem-sparing antibiotic for treatment of acute pyelonephritis due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli Int J Antimicrob Agents 2017; 49(4): 410-5. [ Links].
[46] Grabe M, Bartoletti R, Bjerklund Johansen TE, et al. European Association of Urology. Guidelines on Urological Infections 2015. [Links]
[47] Muder RR, Brennen C, Rihs JD, et al. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from the urinary tract: association of isolation with symptomatic urinary tract infection and subsequent staphylococcal bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 42(1): 46-50. [Links].
[48] Mehndiratta PL, Gur R, Saini S, Bhalla P. Staphylococcus aureus phage types and their correlation to antibiotic resistance. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2010; 53(4): 738-41. [PubMed].
[49] Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(14): 1436-44. [ PubMed].
[50] Edwards JR. Meropenem: a microbiological overview. J Antimicrob Chemother 1995; 36(Suppl A): 1-17.
[51] Markwart R, Willrich N, Haller S, et al. The rise in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium in Germany: data from the German Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (ARS). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8: 147.