The Open Orthopaedics Journal




ISSN: 1874-3250 ― Volume 13, 2019

Are Two Screws Enough for Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures? A Case Series and Review of the Literature



K.C Xarchas*, C.D Staikos, S Pelekas, T Vogiatzaki, K.J Kazakos, D.A Verettas
Orthopaedic Department, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece

Abstract

There is still a controversy in literature regarding the treatment of subcapital fractures of the hip with internal fixation. Different methods have been tested and studies such as in cadavers mainly prejudge the three cannulated screws application. We present a series of 20 patients in which percutaneous fixation with two parallel cannulated screws under specific technical conditions has led to an uneventful fracture union. No complications were observed at a one year follow-up. Reviewing the literature we found no previous clinical studies on the subject.

Keywords: Femoral neck fractures, cannulated screws, fixation.


Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2007
Volume: 1
First Page: 4
Last Page: 8
Publisher Id: TOORTHJ-1-4
DOI: 10.2174/1874325000701010004

Article History:

Received Date: 13/9/2007
Revision Received Date: 9/10/2007
Acceptance Date: 17/10/2007
Electronic publication date: 8/11/2007
Collection year: 2007

Article Metrics:

CrossRef Citations:
0

Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 2170
Abstract HTML Views: 1196
PDF Downloads: 370
Total Views/Downloads: 3736

Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 931
Abstract HTML Views: 736
PDF Downloads: 261
Total Views/Downloads: 1928
Geographical View

2007 Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/), which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


* Address correspondence to this author at the University Hospital of Alexandroupolis, Dragana, Alexandroupolis 68100, Greece; Tel/Fax: 003025510 30369; E-mail: drkcxr@yahoo.com





INTRODUCTION

Subcapital hip fractures in younger patients, usually as a result of high-energy trauma, are considered to be rare and more frequent to men than women. The unusual fatigue fractures should also be taken into account, though such fractures are difficult to be diagnosed. Sufficient bone density is present, as opposed to elderly patients where such fractures are associated with osteopenia. Subcapital hip fractures in younger patients are generally treated with internal fixation rather than with primary hemiarthroplasty, which is generally reserved for older, low-demand patients. But what is the distinction of the age groups in order to determine the treatment method? Most of the authors reserve replacement for patients over 75 years of age. The decision should be certainly based on biological criteria rather than on the absolute age. Avascular necrosis can occur following this injury because of disruption of the femoral head blood supply. Therefore urgent fracture reduction is necessary to minimize the risk of avascular necrosis, and the golden standard is internal fixation through cannulated screws.

In this study we present our clinical experience with percutaneous application of two cannulated screws and review the relevant literature. By doing so we aim to contribute on the discussion whether two cannulated screws can provide sufficient fixation for this kind of fractures. We classify fractures according to the most commonly used radiological classification of Garden. Repeated studies of intra- and inter-observer variations have shown that this classification is only accurate for dividing fractures into those which are undisplaced (grade I and II) and displaced (grade III and IV). The Pauwels classification is based on the angle of the fracture line to the horizontal. The more vertical fractures will have a greater shearing stress across their surfaces and therefore a higher tendency for displacement under loading.It has been found to be of no clinical significance [1Parker MJ, Dynan Y. Is Powels classification still valid? Injury 1998; 29: 521-3.]. The recently devised AO classification of intracapsular fractures has been found to have no clinical relevance other than for the division into displaced and undisplaced. It was criticized as very complicated and therefore should not be used [2Blundell CM, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Hopkinson-Woolley J, Bhonsle SS. Assessment of the AO classification of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 679-83.].

MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY

This study included 20 patients who had good general condition, no escorting diseases and were in excellent mental health. The mean age was 55 years old and there were six men and fourteen women. The younger patient was a 35 year old man and the oldest a 72 year old woman. The mechanism of injury was a simple fall in twelve cases, a fall from a height in six cases and a road traffic accident in two cases. There were fourteen right and six left hips. Regarding their occupation, there were ten pensioners, two manual workers, six involved in agricultural activities, one professional soldier and one inn-keeper. Seven patients suffered from Garden I type of fracture (Figs. 1, 2, 3), other nine from Garden II (Figs. 4, 5, 6), and four patients had Garden III subcapital fracture (Figs. 7, 8, 9). Patients with Garden IV type of fracture were excluded from the trial as well as patients who had been treated with delayed fixation (more than twelve hours after the injury). We decided the exclusion of patients with a G IV fracture because in our experience such fractures most often require open reduction. In the entire series of twenty patients, fracture fixation was performed 6 to 8 hours after the injury. The research included patients that had been operated on during a time period of two years. One more year was allowed to complete one year follow up for all cases. During this period, there was one more patient with a G III fracture who met the criteria, but was not included in the study because of inadequate reduction, which led to failure of the fixation and a total hip replacement.

Fig (1)

Garden I fracture. Preop.



Fig (2)

Garden I fracture. Postop AP.



Fig (3)

Garden I fracture. Postop Lat.



Fig (4)

Garden II fracture. Preop.



Fig (5)

Garden II fracture. Postop AP.



Fig (6)

Garden II fracture. Postop Lat.



Fig (7)

Garden III fracture. Preop.



Fig (8)

Garden III fracture. Postop AP.



Fig (9)

Garden III fracture. Postop Lat.



When necessary, manipulative closed reduction was carried out, using the fracture table and an x-ray image intensifier. Gentle longitudinal traction is first applied while screening in the anteroposterior view. After this the fracture is further reduced by internal rotation of the foot, while screening in the lateral view. This is the most important component of reduction of the fracture and full internal rotation is often necessary. The aim should be to achieve an anatomical or slight valgus position of the femoral head on the anteroposterior view. A varus position must be avoided. On the lateral radiograph, the femoral head, neck, trochanteric region and shaft should lie in a straight line. After reduction, true postero-anterior and lateral radiographs were retained for formal measurement according to the criteria of Garden: valgus 0-200 to the postero-anterior aspect and ±200 from the neutral position in the lateral view.

We applied two parallel cannulated screws percutaneously under fluoroscopic imaging up to the subchondral area (5mm. from joint line). Choosing the frontal plane, the lower screw was placed just superior to the calcar, with the tip in the subchondral bone close to the joint line. This gives a three-point fixation of the femoral head, calcar and the lateral cortical bone. The second screw was placed in parallel fashion centrally on the anteroposterior view. On the lateral radiograph, both screws were positioned in the middle and posterior part of the neck. When the sagittal plane was chosen, the first screw was positioned posteriorly and then a second parallel and in front of it with a tendency to spread them as possible, covering the neck in the lateral view. On the frontal plane screws were again introduced close to the calcar. The procedure was always carried out by the same surgeon. The cannulated screws used in our series (ASNIS-Stryker) have a shaft and wing diameter of 6.5 mm. The core diameter is 5.0mm. The average duration of the procedure was 15 min and the blood loss was less than 20ml. All patients were encouraged to mobilization within 24 hours and they were discharged two days after the operation. Shadow walking was immediately commenced and full weight bearing allowed on the sixth postoperative week.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up at the outpatients department for one year at least. Monthly radiographic evaluation established fracture healing. All fractures united, and no patient underwent surgery for delayed union or nonunion. Avascular necrosis (assessed by clinical examination, xray control and MRI scan in only two suspicious cases) did not occur in any case and also no deaths, deep venous thromboses, or wound infections were noted. All patients had a decreased range of movement of the operated hip, especially in internal rotation but this was neither painful nor limiting their daily activities. Twelve patients returned to their previous occupations and the rest of them restricted their activities for subjective reasons. All patients were satisfied from the operation they had undergone.

DISCUSSION- CONCLUSIONS

Cannulated screws are now universally used for the fixation of femoral neck fractures. They provide better fixation than pins which are known to have a significantly lower rate of nonunion and infection than the sliding screw-plate [3Christie J, Howie Cr, Armour PC. Fixation of displaced subcapital femoral fractures. Compression screw fixation versus double divergent pins J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 70: 199-201.]. When directly compared to the screws, no advantage was shown for an implant with a side plate [4Parker MJ, Blundell C. Choice of implant for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Meta analysis of 25 randomised trials including 4,925 patients Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69: 138-43.].

Screws should be applied in a parallel fashion [5Parker MJ, Porter KM, Eastwood DM, Schembi Wismayer M, Bernard AA. Intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur. Parallel or crossed garden screws Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 826-7.] and when two screws are used, they should have a shaft diameter of at least 6.5 mm [6Loken S, Andreassen GS. Surgery of femoral neck fractures-higher rate of osteosynthesis failure with the use of 4.5 mm screws compared to 6.5 mm screws Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2001; 121: 2474-5.]. Positioning of a screw inferiorly and close to the calcar in the AP plane, offers cortical support to the screw and therefore better fixation. The same applies for posterior placement of a screw on the lateral view [7Lindequist S, Wredmark T, Eriksson SA, Samnegard E. Screw positions in femoral neck fractures. Comparison of two different screws Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 67-70.,8Lindequist S. Cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 289-93.,9Lindequist S, Tornkvist H. Quality of reduction and cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9: 215-.]. On the lateral view a reduced spread of the screws was associated with an increased risk of nonunion of the fracture [10Gurusamy K, Parker MJ, Rowlands TK. The complications of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip:the effect of screw positioning and angulation on fracture healing J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 632-4.]. These technical guidelines were strictly kept in our series forming the operative technique that has already been described.

Though there appears to be no clinical evidence indicating which design of screws is preferable, or if two, three or more screws are the best, biomechanic studies in cadavers [11Husby T, Alho A, Ronningen H. Stability of femoral neck osteosynthesis.Comparison of fixation methods in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 299-302.,12Maurer SG, Wright KE, Kummer FJ, Zuckermann JD, Koval KJ. Two or three screws for fixation of femoral neck factures? Am J Orthop 2003; 32: 438-2.] or using bone models [13Selvan VT, Oakley MJ, Rangan A, Al-Lami MK. Optimum configuration of cannulated hip screws for the fixation of intracapsular hip fractures: a biomechanical study Injury 2004; 35: 136-41.] favor the application of three screws in a triangular fashion. On clinical grounds, Parker and Blundell [4Parker MJ, Blundell C. Choice of implant for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Meta analysis of 25 randomised trials including 4,925 patients Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69: 138-43.] meta analyzed 25 randomized trials including 4,925 patients and found it impossible to determine the optimum number or type of screws.

The classic method of three cannulated screws is also used in our Department. In spite of its good results, longer operating time, increased irradiation and more demanding technique, were observed. Proper triangulation of the screws is extremely difficult to be achieved by closed means and may require the open technique to be used. Complications often related to this method including screw malpositioning , neck penetration and cut out were not met in our series.

In our opinion, given the right conditions as reduction close to ideal, proper prompt fixation and early mobilization is probably more significant than querying two or three screws for fixation; we suppose the percutaneous application of two cannulated screws as a less harming method for bone and soft tissues, relates to quicker bone healing and minimal complications. If good reduction has been achieved, early weight bearing is possibly a contributing factor to fracture healing through impaction and backing of the screws (Figs. 10, 11).

Fig (10)

Fracture healing through impaction and backing of the screws. Preop



Fig (11)

Fracture healing through impaction and backing of the screws. Postop at 3 months.



We do recognize that this is a case series with no control group. Our aim was to contribute on the discussion whether two cannulated screws can provide sufficient fixation for subcapital fractures of the neck of femur. It is certain that to give an answer on this controversial issue, larger and better designed studies will be required. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of the method in selected patients is very encouraging.

REFERENCES

[1] Parker MJ, Dynan Y. Is Powels classification still valid? Injury 1998; 29: 521-3.
[2] Blundell CM, Parker MJ, Pryor GA, Hopkinson-Woolley J, Bhonsle SS. Assessment of the AO classification of intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 679-83.
[3] Christie J, Howie Cr, Armour PC. Fixation of displaced subcapital femoral fractures. Compression screw fixation versus double divergent pins J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 70: 199-201.
[4] Parker MJ, Blundell C. Choice of implant for internal fixation of femoral neck fractures. Meta analysis of 25 randomised trials including 4,925 patients Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69: 138-43.
[5] Parker MJ, Porter KM, Eastwood DM, Schembi Wismayer M, Bernard AA. Intracapsular fractures of the neck of femur. Parallel or crossed garden screws Bone Joint Surg Br 1991; 73: 826-7.
[6] Loken S, Andreassen GS. Surgery of femoral neck fractures-higher rate of osteosynthesis failure with the use of 4.5 mm screws compared to 6.5 mm screws Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2001; 121: 2474-5.
[7] Lindequist S, Wredmark T, Eriksson SA, Samnegard E. Screw positions in femoral neck fractures. Comparison of two different screws Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 67-70.
[8] Lindequist S. Cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures Acta Orthop Scand 1993; 64: 289-93.
[9] Lindequist S, Tornkvist H. Quality of reduction and cortical screw support in femoral neck fractures J Orthop Trauma 1995; 9: 215-.
[10] Gurusamy K, Parker MJ, Rowlands TK. The complications of displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip:the effect of screw positioning and angulation on fracture healing J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87: 632-4.
[11] Husby T, Alho A, Ronningen H. Stability of femoral neck osteosynthesis.Comparison of fixation methods in cadavers. Acta Orthop Scand 1989; 60: 299-302.
[12] Maurer SG, Wright KE, Kummer FJ, Zuckermann JD, Koval KJ. Two or three screws for fixation of femoral neck factures? Am J Orthop 2003; 32: 438-2.
[13] Selvan VT, Oakley MJ, Rangan A, Al-Lami MK. Optimum configuration of cannulated hip screws for the fixation of intracapsular hip fractures: a biomechanical study Injury 2004; 35: 136-41.

Endorsements



"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."


Daniel Pesut
(Indiana University School of Nursing, USA)

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."


Jacques Descotes
(Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, France)

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."


Patrice Talaga
(UCB S.A., Belgium)

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."


Jeffrey M. Weinberg
(St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA)

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."


Debomoy K. Lahiri
(Indiana University School of Medicine, USA)

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."


Robert Looney
(Naval Postgraduate School, USA)

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."


Richard Reithinger
(Westat, USA)

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."


J. Ferwerda
(University of Oxford, UK)

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."


Sean L. Kitson
(Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland)

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."


Hubert Wolterbeek
(Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."


Alessandro Laviano
(Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy)

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."


Philippe Hernigou
(Paris University, France)

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."


Fidel Toldrá
(Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, Spain)

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."


M. Bendandi
(University Clinic of Navarre, Spain)

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."


Peter Chiba
(University of Vienna, Austria)

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."


Jaime Sampaio
(University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal)

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."


Eduardo A. Castro
(INIFTA, Argentina)

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."


Kenji Hashimoto
(Chiba University, Japan)

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."


Daniel Shek
(Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."


Jih Ru Hwu
(National Central University, Taiwan)


Browse Contents




Webmaster Contact: info@benthamopen.net
Copyright © 2019 Bentham Open