Table 1: Comparison between the two groups.
Variable |
Implant Failure |
Significance |
No |
Yes |
Age (mean) |
56 + 23.0 SD |
64.28 + 12.0 SD |
0.104 |
Gender |
|
|
|
Male |
18 (48.6%) |
4 (30.8%) |
0.273 |
Female |
19 (51.4%) |
9 (69.2%) |
|
Mechanism of injury |
|
|
|
Fall |
23 (62.2%) |
9 (69.23%) |
|
RTA |
13 (35.1%) |
4 (30.8%) |
0.921 |
FAI |
1 (2.7%) |
0 (0%) |
|
Fracture classification |
|
|
|
AO |
|
|
|
A |
6 (16.2%) |
3 (23.1%) |
|
B |
22 (59.5%) |
4 (30.8%) |
0.192 |
C |
9 (24.3%) |
6 (46.1%) |
|
Seinsheimer’s |
|
|
|
<3
|
24 (64.9%) |
6 (46.2%) |
0.236 |
>4 |
13 (35.1%) |
7 (53.8%) |
|
ASA status |
|
|
|
I |
5 (13.5%) |
2 (15.4%) |
|
II |
21 (56.8%) |
8 (61.5%) |
0.796 |
III |
11 (29.7%) |
3 (23.1%) |
|
RTA= Road traffic accident; FAI= Fire arm injury