Table 1: Patient Demographics & Intra-operative findings.

Patient number Age in years Duration of Follow-up in months Sex Acetabular cartilage Femoral head cartilage Location of labral damage Reason for labral reconstruction Additional surgical procedure
1 32 24 M Zone 2- 3, Grade 2 Normal 12 to 2 o’clock Complex tear CAM resection, Rim trimming
2 36 36 M Zone 2- 3, Grade 2 Normal 12 to 3 o’clock Complex tear CAM resection, Rim trimming, micro fractures
3 28 26 M Zone 2-3, Grade 1 Normal 11 to 3 o’clock Complex tear CAM resection, Rim trimming
4 42 27 M Zone 2-3, Grade 3 Normal 9 to 12 o’clock Complex tear & degenerative damage CAM resection, Rim trimming, micro fractures
5 41 16 M Zone 2-3, Grade 2 Normal 12 to 3 o’clock Complex tear CAM resection, Rim trimming,
Debridement
6 26 21 M Zone 2-3, Grade 2 Normal 11 to 2 o’clock Complex tear CAM resection, Rim trimming,
Debridement
7 30 18 M Zone 2-3, Grade 2 Normal 10 to 1 o’clock Complex tear CAM resection, Rim trimming,
Debridement
8 33 22 M Zone 3, Grade 2 Normal 11 to 2 o’clock Complex tear CAM resection, Rim trimming,
Debridement
9 43 19 M Zone 2-3, Grade 2 Normal 9 to 1 o’clock Degenerative damage CAM resection, Rim trimming, micro fractures
10 44 20 M Zone 2-3, Grade 3 Normal 9 to 1 o’clock Complex tear & degenerative damage CAM resection, Rim trimming, cartilage repair using collagen gel