The Open Orthopaedics Journal




ISSN: 1874-3250 ― Volume 13, 2019

Acute Hematogenous Infection of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty by Oral Bacteria in a Patient without a History of Dental Procedures: Case Report



Motoki Sonohata*, Masaru Kitajima, Syunsuke Kawano, Masaaki Mawatari
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, 5-1-1 Nabeshima, Saga 849-8501, Japan

Abstract

The risk of periprosthetic joint infection from hematogenous bacterial seeding is increased in patients undergoing dental procedures that facilitate the development of bacteremia.

We herein report the case of a patient without a history of dental procedures who suffered from an acute metastatic infection of a hip prosthesis by the oral bacterium Streptococcus mutans 18 months after undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty. The patient was successfully treated by two-stage revision surgery.

It is important to realize that the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis against joint infections has not yet been convincingly proven. As a result, optimal dental hygiene and regular dental visits may be more important than antibiotic prophylaxis for maintaining joint health. Therefore, orthopedic surgeons should educate patients with joint prostheses about good oral health.

Keywords: : Antibiotic prophylaxis, bacteremia, hematogenous, infection, oral bacteria, Streptococcus mutans, total hip arthroplasty..


Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2014
Volume: 8
First Page: 56
Last Page: 59
Publisher Id: TOORTHJ-8-56
DOI: 10.2174/1874325001408010056

Article History:

Received Date: 29/7/2013
Revision Received Date: 10/3/2014
Acceptance Date: 29/3/2014
Electronic publication date: 7/3/2014
Collection year: 2014

Article Metrics:

CrossRef Citations:
0

Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1195
Abstract HTML Views: 912
PDF Downloads: 263
Total Views/Downloads: 2370

Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 757
Abstract HTML Views: 584
PDF Downloads: 169
Total Views/Downloads: 1510
Geographical View

© Sonohata et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/) which permits unrestrictive use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, Nabeshima 5-1-1, Saga 849-8501, Japan; Tel: +81-952-34-2343; Fax: +81-952-34-2059; E-mail: sonohata@cc.saga-u.ac.jp




INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic joint infection is the most common and severe complication following joint replacement. There are many prophylactic methods for decreasing the incidence of surgical site infection; however, late infection due to bacteremia remains difficult to diagnose and treat.

The risk of periprosthetic joint infection from hematogenous bacterial seeding is increased in patients undergoing dental procedures that facilitate the development of bacteremia [1American Dental Association, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Advisory statement. Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with total joint replacements J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128(7): 1004-8.-3Maderazo EG, Judson S, Pasternak H. Late infections of total joint prostheses. A review and recommendations for prevention Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 299: 131-42.]. Although it was previously recommended that patients with major joint prostheses receive antibiotic prophylaxis appropriate to the flora of the oral cavity when dental treatment is undertaken [4Field E, Martin M. Prophylactic antibiotics for patients with artificial joints undergoing oral and dental surgery: necessary or not? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 29(5): 341-6., 5Simmons N, Ball A, Cawson R. Case against antibiotic prophylaxis for dental treatment of patients with joint prostheses Lancet 1992; 339: 301.], this practice is controversial [6Morris AM, Howie S. Recommendations for antibiotics in patients with joint prosthesis are irresponsible and indefensible J Can Dent Assoc 2009; 75(7): 513-., 7Uçkay I, Pittet D, Bernard L, Lew D, Perrier A, Peter R. Antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures in patients with arthroplasties of the hip and knee J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(7): 833-.]. The incidence of infection in site of joint replacements due to hematogenous seeding from dental procedures has been reported to be 0.04-0.1% in reviews [7Uçkay I, Pittet D, Bernard L, Lew D, Perrier A, Peter R. Antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures in patients with arthroplasties of the hip and knee J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(7): 833-.], and there are many case reports concerning such patients [8LaPorte DM, Waldman BJ, Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Infections associated with dental procedures in total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81(1): 56-9.-10Brown ML, Drinkwater CJ. Hematogenous infection of total hip arthroplasty with actinomyces following a noninvasive dental procedure Orthopedics 2012; 35(7): e1086-9.].

However, there are few reports regarding metastatic infections of site of joint replacement by oral bacteriain patients without a history of dental procedures. We here in report the case of a patient without a history of dental procedures who suffered from an acute metastatic infection of a hip prosthesis by the oral bacteria Streptococcus mutans, 18 months after undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty (THA).

The study protocol adhered to the ethics guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, and the study was approved by the institutional review board of the Faculty of Medicine, Saga University. The patient was informed that this case study would be submitted for publication, and she provided her informed consent.

CASE

A 53-year old female underwent cup and ball revision of a right THA due to loosening and osteolysis 17 years after primary surgery using a cementless THA (Fig. 1). She did not take any corticosteroids and had no history of disease associated with a possibility of infection, such as diabetic mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, liver cirrhosis, etc.

Fig. (1)

A pre-revision pelvic radiograph. The right hip acetabular components, 16 years after the first THA, had loosened due to polyethylene wear.



No clinical signs of infection were observed prior to the revision surgery.

The laboratory findings included a C-reactive protein (CRP) level of 0.06 mg/dl and a white blood cell (WBC) count of 6,600 cells/μl. The normal value for CRP in the hospital laboratory is a CRP level below 0.3 mg/dl. During the revision surgery, after removing the ball, liner and shell, a cementless porous HA-coated acetabular component and polyethylene liner (AMS-HA acetabular shell and AMS liner; Kyocera, Kyoto, Japan) were implanted. In addition, a new metal ball (C-taper; Stryker, Mahwah, New Jersey, USA) was implanted (Fig. 2).

Fig. (2)

A post-revision pelvic radiograph. The right hip acetabular components, shell, liner and ball were re-implanted.



With respect to the intraoperative findings, no signs of infection were observed and no specimens obtained intraoperatively for culture at the time of the revision surgery.

Following the revision surgery, the patient was given intravenous cefazolin at the time of induction of anesthesia and for 24 hours postoperatively. She exhibited a routine recovery and showed no symptoms of infection until 18 months after the revision surgery.

However, the patient reported gradually worsening right hip pain. Two weeks later, she visited our institution using a wheelchair. She was febrile (38.7 °C) and had a swollen right thigh with severe pain on motion of the hip joint; however, no fistulas were evidenced. The laboratory findings included a CRP level of 22.3 mg/dl and a WBC count of 5,500 cells/μl. The patient underwent aspiration of the right hip joint for culture; however, no aspirate was obtained.

Two-stage revision surgery was planned to treat the infected THA.

The patient underwent removal of the entire THA implant. There was pus in the capsule, and cup loosening was found. The patient underwent debridement of the area around the abscess in an effort to prevent progression of the infection. The area was thoroughly irrigated using pulsed lavage with 30 liters of saline. Finally, a cement mold was inserted into the femur (Fig. 3). The cement mold consisted of 120 g bone cement and 6 g of vancomycin. The patient was administered 1,200 mg of linezolid for 14 days. Streptococcus mutans, a Gram-positive coccus was identified in all four of the intraoperative specimens (Table 1). The antibiotics were subsequently changed to a combination of 900 mg of clindamycin and 1000 mg of ampicillin.

Fig. (3)

A pelvic radiograph after the implant in the right hip was removed. The cement mold was implanted.



Table 1

Drug susceptibility.




The patient was referred to the department of dental surgery at our institution for an assessment of her dental problems. The dentist diagnosed her with caries.

However, Streptococcus parasanguinis, a resident of the flora of the oral cavity was identified only in specimens obtained from the patient’s mouth. The laboratory findings related to infection were all within the normal ranges, and the patient underwent revision total hip arthroplasty eight weeks after the implant removal.

The operation was performed using an HA-coated cementless femoral component, an HA-coated cementless acetabular shell, a polyethylene liner and a zirconia ball (Kyocera, Kyoto, Japan).

A morselized allogenic bone graft was packed on the floor of the acetabulum (Fig. 4).

Fig. (4)

A pelvic radiograph taken after the re-revision. The right hip components were implanted again.



Following completion of the total revision surgery, the patient continuously received oral antibiotics consisting of 900 mg of clindamycin and 1000 mg of ampicillin for six months.

The last follow-up occurred approximately 23 months after the total revision surgery, at which time, all laboratory findings indicative of infection remained well within the normal limits, no clinical signs of infection were noted and the prosthesis appeared to be well fixed radiographically. The patient is currently able to walk without a cane.

DISCUSSION

Infections of sites of total hip or knee arthroplasty due to hematogenous seeding of oral bacteria are very rare [11Olsen I, Snorrason F, Lingaas E. Should patients with hip joint prosthesis receive antibiotic prophylaxis before dental treatment? J Oral Microbiol 2010; 30: 2.]. However, Maderazo et al. reported that oral bacteria are the cause of 15% of late infections of joint prostheses [3Maderazo EG, Judson S, Pasternak H. Late infections of total joint prostheses. A review and recommendations for prevention Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 299: 131-42.]. Several kinds of oral bacteria have been reported to be the causes of late infection following joint arthroplasty, many cases of which are due to Streptococcus viridans [8LaPorte DM, Waldman BJ, Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Infections associated with dental procedures in total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81(1): 56-9., 12Waldman BJ, Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Total knee arthroplasty infections associated with dental procedures Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 343: 164-72.]. The Streptococcus mutans identified in the current case is a bacterium that causes dental caries; however, it is not a normal inhabitant of the mouth.

There are few reports of late infections of joint prostheses due to Streptococcus mutans [12Waldman BJ, Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Total knee arthroplasty infections associated with dental procedures Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 343: 164-72.]. In addition, many of the cases demonstrating late infections at the sites of joint prostheses due to oral bacteria occurred following such dental procedures as tooth extraction, periodontal scaling and endodontic surgery [8LaPorte DM, Waldman BJ, Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Infections associated with dental procedures in total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81(1): 56-9.].

This is the first report of a late infection due to Streptococcus mutans following total hip arthroplasty in a patient without a history of dental procedures.

Although the use of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental procedures has been advocated in many reports in order to protect patients against periprosthetic joint infection [3Maderazo EG, Judson S, Pasternak H. Late infections of total joint prostheses. A review and recommendations for prevention Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 299: 131-42.-5Simmons N, Ball A, Cawson R. Case against antibiotic prophylaxis for dental treatment of patients with joint prostheses Lancet 1992; 339: 301., 13Rubin R, Salvati E, Lewis R. Infected total hip replacement after dental procedures Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 41(1): 18-23.-15Stinchfield FE, Bigliani LU, Neu HC, Goss TP, Foster CR. Late haematogenous infection of total joint replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62(8): 1345-50.], this practice is controversial.

In contrast, Lockhart et al. [16Lockhart PB, Brennan MT, Sasser HC, Fox PC, Paster BJ, Bahrani-Mougeot FK. Bacteremia associated with tooth brushing and dental extraction Circulation 2008; 117(24): 3118-25.] studied bacteremia in the context of tooth brushing and dental extraction and reported that simple tooth brushing provoked bacteremia in 32% of patients, which suggests that a typical patient is exposed to more than 200 episodes of bacteremia per year. In addition, Assael [17Assael LA. Oral bacteremia as a cause of prosthesis failure in patients with joint replacements J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67(9): 1789-90.] reported that only a small proportion of cases of bacteremia originating from an oral source is associated with dental treatment and that it would not be reasonable to recommend that millions of patients be medicated at enormous cost simply based upon the findings of a few case reports.

There are several types of national guidelines/recommendations concerning the use of antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures in patients undergoing joint replacement [7Uçkay I, Pittet D, Bernard L, Lew D, Perrier A, Peter R. Antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures in patients with arthroplasties of the hip and knee J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(7): 833-., 11Olsen I, Snorrason F, Lingaas E. Should patients with hip joint prosthesis receive antibiotic prophylaxis before dental treatment? J Oral Microbiol 2010; 30: 2.]. These recommendations are controversial. Some guidelines recommend appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis; however, they do not recommend the use of such prophylaxis in healthy patients with joint prostheses. The administration of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental treatment is recommended in patients with diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, hemophilia or malignancy or those undergoing invasive dental treatment [7Uçkay I, Pittet D, Bernard L, Lew D, Perrier A, Peter R. Antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures in patients with arthroplasties of the hip and knee J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(7): 833-., 11Olsen I, Snorrason F, Lingaas E. Should patients with hip joint prosthesis receive antibiotic prophylaxis before dental treatment? J Oral Microbiol 2010; 30: 2.].

In contrast, some guidelines do not recommend the use of antibiotic prophylaxis.

In 2003, The American Dental Association (ADA), in collaboration with the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) [2American Dental Association, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with total joint replacements J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134(7): 895-9.], issued an advisory statement recommending the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in patient with certain conditions, such as previous infection of an artificial joint, diabetes mellitus and others. However, in 2009, the AAOS [7Uçkay I, Pittet D, Bernard L, Lew D, Perrier A, Peter R. Antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures in patients with arthroplasties of the hip and knee J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(7): 833-., 11Olsen I, Snorrason F, Lingaas E. Should patients with hip joint prosthesis receive antibiotic prophylaxis before dental treatment? J Oral Microbiol 2010; 30: 2.] stated that all patients with a history of total knee or hip arthroplasty are at an increased risk for bacteremia following dental procedures thus are considered to require antibiotic treatment prior to undergoing invasive dental procedures.

In addition, the most recent statements of the AAOS and ADA [18American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, American Dental Association, “Prevention of Orthopedic Implant Infection in Patients Undergoing Dental Procedure. Evidence-Based Guideline and Evidence Report. AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline 2012; Unit v0.2 2.2” Available from: http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/PUDP/PUDP_guid eline.pdf ] issued in 2012 include the following three recommendations:

  1. The practitioner may consider discontinuing the practice of routinely prescribing prophylactic antibiotics for patients with hip and knee prosthetic joint implants undergoing dental procedures.
  2. We are unable to recommend for or against the use of topical oral antimicrobials in patients with prosthetic joint implants or other orthopedic implants undergoing dental procedures.
  3. In the absence of reliable evidence linking poor oral health to prosthetic joint infection, it is the opinion of the work group that patients with prosthetic joint implants or other orthopedic implants maintain appropriate oral hygiene.

These recommendations reflect significant changes in the guidelines.

The current case suggests the possibility of hematogenous infection of joint prostheses in patients without a history of dental procedures and highlights the controversy surrounding the use of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to dental procedures. It is important to realize that the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis against joint infections has not yet convincingly been proven. Optimal dental hygiene and regular dental visits may be more important than antibiotic prophylaxis in maintaining joint health. Therefore, orthopedic surgeons should educate patients with joint prostheses about good oral health.

CONCLUSION

Our report described a case of hematogenous infection of a hip prosthesis caused by oral bacteria. The incidence of such infections is not high; however, orthopedic surgeons are often asked to provide antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures by patients. Clinicians should reduce the use of unnecessary antibiotic prophylaxis. Treatments and procedures applicable to individual patients rely on mutual communication between the patient, physician, dentist and other healthcare practitioners. Realistically, orthopedic surgeons should prescribe antibiotic prophylaxis as appropriate after obtaining adequate informed consent.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors did not receive and will not receive any benefits or funding from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1] American Dental Association, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Advisory statement. Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with total joint replacements J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128(7): 1004-8.
[2] American Dental Association, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental patients with total joint replacements J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134(7): 895-9.
[3] Maderazo EG, Judson S, Pasternak H. Late infections of total joint prostheses. A review and recommendations for prevention Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 299: 131-42.
[4] Field E, Martin M. Prophylactic antibiotics for patients with artificial joints undergoing oral and dental surgery: necessary or not? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 29(5): 341-6.
[5] Simmons N, Ball A, Cawson R. Case against antibiotic prophylaxis for dental treatment of patients with joint prostheses Lancet 1992; 339: 301.
[6] Morris AM, Howie S. Recommendations for antibiotics in patients with joint prosthesis are irresponsible and indefensible J Can Dent Assoc 2009; 75(7): 513-.
[7] Uçkay I, Pittet D, Bernard L, Lew D, Perrier A, Peter R. Antibiotic prophylaxis before invasive dental procedures in patients with arthroplasties of the hip and knee J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90(7): 833-.
[8] LaPorte DM, Waldman BJ, Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Infections associated with dental procedures in total hip arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81(1): 56-9.
[9] Kaar TK, Bogoch ER, Devlin HR. Acute metastatic infection of a revision total hip arthroplasty with oral bacteria after noninvasive dental treatment J Arthroplasty 2000; 15(5): 675-8.
[10] Brown ML, Drinkwater CJ. Hematogenous infection of total hip arthroplasty with actinomyces following a noninvasive dental procedure Orthopedics 2012; 35(7): e1086-9.
[11] Olsen I, Snorrason F, Lingaas E. Should patients with hip joint prosthesis receive antibiotic prophylaxis before dental treatment? J Oral Microbiol 2010; 30: 2.
[12] Waldman BJ, Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Total knee arthroplasty infections associated with dental procedures Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 343: 164-72.
[13] Rubin R, Salvati E, Lewis R. Infected total hip replacement after dental procedures Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976; 41(1): 18-23.
[14] Downes E. Late infection after total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 1977; 59(1): 42-.
[15] Stinchfield FE, Bigliani LU, Neu HC, Goss TP, Foster CR. Late haematogenous infection of total joint replacement J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980; 62(8): 1345-50.
[16] Lockhart PB, Brennan MT, Sasser HC, Fox PC, Paster BJ, Bahrani-Mougeot FK. Bacteremia associated with tooth brushing and dental extraction Circulation 2008; 117(24): 3118-25.
[17] Assael LA. Oral bacteremia as a cause of prosthesis failure in patients with joint replacements J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67(9): 1789-90.
[18] American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, American Dental Association, “Prevention of Orthopedic Implant Infection in Patients Undergoing Dental Procedure. Evidence-Based Guideline and Evidence Report. AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline 2012; Unit v0.2 2.2” Available from: http://www.aaos.org/research/guidelines/PUDP/PUDP_guid eline.pdf

Endorsements



"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."


Daniel Pesut
(Indiana University School of Nursing, USA)

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."


Jacques Descotes
(Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, France)

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."


Patrice Talaga
(UCB S.A., Belgium)

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."


Jeffrey M. Weinberg
(St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA)

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."


Debomoy K. Lahiri
(Indiana University School of Medicine, USA)

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."


Robert Looney
(Naval Postgraduate School, USA)

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."


Richard Reithinger
(Westat, USA)

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."


J. Ferwerda
(University of Oxford, UK)

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."


Sean L. Kitson
(Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland)

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."


Hubert Wolterbeek
(Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."


Alessandro Laviano
(Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy)

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."


Philippe Hernigou
(Paris University, France)

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."


Fidel Toldrá
(Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, Spain)

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."


M. Bendandi
(University Clinic of Navarre, Spain)

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."


Peter Chiba
(University of Vienna, Austria)

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."


Jaime Sampaio
(University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal)

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."


Eduardo A. Castro
(INIFTA, Argentina)

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."


Kenji Hashimoto
(Chiba University, Japan)

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."


Daniel Shek
(Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."


Jih Ru Hwu
(National Central University, Taiwan)


Browse Contents



Webmaster Contact: info@benthamopen.net
Copyright © 2019 Bentham Open