Table 2: The results of different methods.
No. |
Dimensionless height from the top |
Numerical simulation result |
Mathematic model result |
Correction result |
1 |
0.125 |
828.48 |
166.20 |
898.34 |
2 |
0.25 |
1381.84 |
1023.66 |
1511.75 |
3 |
0.375 |
2203.19 |
1881.10 |
2125.14 |
4 |
0.5 |
2896.51 |
2534.68 |
2534.68 |
5 |
0.625 |
3551.83 |
3595.92 |
3351.88 |
6 |
0.125 |
3011.31 |
2489.04 |
3221.18 |
7 |
0.25 |
3637.13 |
3028.95 |
3517.05 |
8 |
0.375 |
1552.94 |
1438.85 |
1682.90 |
9 |
0.5 |
2506.64 |
2396.56 |
2396.56 |
10 |
0.625 |
1667.51 |
1631.60 |
1387.56 |
11 |
0.125 |
2659.07 |
2046.79 |
2778.93 |
12 |
0.25 |
3680.77 |
2904.59 |
3392.68 |
13 |
0.375 |
3893.64 |
3444.55 |
3688.59 |
14 |
0.5 |
2362.48 |
2816.15 |
2816.15 |
15 |
0.625 |
906.29 |
1189.38 |
945.33 |
16 |
0.125 |
4324.76 |
4052.49 |
4784.63 |
17 |
0.25 |
2669.59 |
2462.41 |
2950.50 |
18 |
0.375 |
2328.41 |
1797.32 |
2041.37 |
19 |
0.5 |
2337.24 |
2396.15 |
2396.15 |
20 |
0.625 |
2850.94 |
3195.03 |
2950.98 |
21 |
0.125 |
4212.54 |
3610.27 |
4342.41 |
22 |
0.25 |
3363.36 |
2945.18 |
3433.27 |
23 |
0.375 |
4203.06 |
3802.97 |
4047.02 |
24 |
0.5 |
2212.92 |
2163.49 |
2163.49 |
25 |
0.625 |
2498.76 |
2752.85 |
2508.81 |