The Open Rheumatology Journal




ISSN: 1874-3129 ― Volume 14, 2020

An Open Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Oral NSAIDs Versus Steroid Intra-Articular Infiltration in Congestive Osteoarthritis of the Knee



Ouédraogo Dieu-Donné1, *, Ouédraogo Théodore2, Zabsonré/Tiendrébéogo Joëlle1, Dionou Pierre1, Ouédraogo Smaïla3, Compaoré Christian4, Kaboré Fulgence1, Drabo Youssouf Joseph5
1 Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
2 Department of Anatomy; UFR SDS, University of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
3 Department of Epidemiology and Statistic, University Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
4 Department of Internal Medicine, International Polyclinic, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
5 Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the efficacy on pain and joint function of NSAIDs versus steroid intra-articular infiltration in congestive knee osteoarthritis.

Patients and Methods:

Open randomized study comparing a series of patients treated with NSAIDs for 21 days and another who received steroid intra-articular infiltration (SIAI) spaced at every 7 days. The visual analog scale was used for the weekly assessment of spontaneous pain and pain when walking. Lequesne functional pain scale was used to assess the functional impact of knee osteoarthritis.

Results:

Seventy patients were enrolled, including 35 in the NSAID arm and 35 in SIAI arm. Forty-nine (70%) had stage III of Kellgren and Lawrance scale. On admission, the average pain intensity was 50.46 ± 30.93 in the NSAID arm and 60.92 ± 30 in SIAI arm (p = 0.0189). At the end of follow-up, pain intensity was 6.72 ± 13 in NSAIDs patients and 17.80 ± 21 in SIAI one (p = 0.001). The average intensity of pain on walking was 64.41 ± 22.61. It was 53.33 ± 22.31 in NSAID’s against 74.85 ± 17.55 in SIAI patients (P <0.0001). At the end of the treatment, they were respectively 19.11 ± 11.37, and 35 ± 30.69 (P = 0.0085).

Conclusion:

Corticosteroid injections have a short efficacy compared to NSAIDs. Prescribing NSAIDs should consider the cons-indications, comorbidities and their deleterious digestive, renal, and cardiovascular effect.

Keywords: Cardiovascular effect, Knee osteoarthritis, NSAIDs, Steroid intra-articular injection.


Article Information


Identifiers and Pagination:

Year: 2016
Volume: 10
First Page: 8
Last Page: 12
Publisher Id: TORJ-10-8
DOI: 10.2174/1874312901610010008

Article History:

Received Date: 29/8/2015
Revision Received Date: 5/11/2015
Acceptance Date: 5/11/2015
Electronic publication date: 29/2/2016
Collection year: 2016

© Dieu-Donné et al.; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.


* Address correspondence to this author at 09 BP 628 Ouagadougou. Burkina-Faso; Email: ouedd@yahoo.fr





INTRODUCTION

The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are known for their efficiency in the congestive osteoarthritis of the knee. Complications including cardiovascular were better documented in recent years and the indications most detailed [1Bruyère O, Cooper C, Pelletier JP, et al. An algorithm recommendation for the management of knee osteoarthritis in Europe and internationally: a report from a task force of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014; 44(3): 253-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.05.014] [PMID: 24953861]
].

Steroid intra-articular infiltration (SIAI) is an effective alternative [2Konai MS, Vilar Furtado RN, Dos Santos MF, Natour J. Monoarticular corticosteroid injection versus systemic administration in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized double-blind controlled study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27(2): 214-21.
[PMID: 19473560]
]; however, their effect seems short, not more than two to three weeks. In practice, the choice of treatment, NSAIDs or SIAI is not codified and predictors of efficacy of SIAI little known [3Hirsch G, Kitas G, Klocke R. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection in osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: factors predicting pain relief--a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013; 42(5): 451-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.08.005] [PMID: 23374502]
]. Few studies have compared the efficacy of NSAIDs and SIAI in short and medium terms in knee osteoarthritis.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy on pain and joint function of drug treatment with NSAIDs versus SIAI in knee osteoarthritis in congestive thrust.

Patients and methods

This was a prospective open randomized trial conducted from 15 July 2013 to 15 February 2014 in Rheumatology and Orthopedic Surgery department, at the University Hospital Yalgado Ouedraogo. Consenting patients coming in consultation for knee osteoarthritis in congestive thrust were included. Patients were openly randomized alternately in both parts and were monitored for 6 weeks either in consultation or by phone call. The patients who could not be monitored, changed treatment or associated other treatment were excluded from the study.

Table 1

Patient characteristics.




Diclofenac and aceclofenac were used respectively at a dose of 150 mg and 200 mg twice daily for 21 days. The cortivazol 3,75 mg or betamethasone 2 mg was used for intra-articular infiltration in a series of 3 injections spaced one week each. The algofunctional Lequesne index was assessed at the beginning and at the end of follow-up of each patient. The visual analog scale (0 to 100) was used to evaluate the intensity of pain whether spontaneous or when walking. If there is bilateral knee osteoarthritis, the most symptomatic knee was the target of the study.

The data were entered into computer and analyzed with the software Epi-Info version 3.5.1. Chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to compare qualitative variables. The ANOVA test was used for comparison of means. The Statistical significance was α <0.05. Oral and informed consent was required.

RESULTS

Characteristics of the Target Population

Eighty-three patients were included during the study period. During follow-up, 13 patients were excluded, five due to self medication and additional eight due to the ineffectiveness of treatment. Seventy patients were selected including 35 treated with NSAIDs and 35 who received SIAI. The average age of patients was 53.04 years with extremes of 32 and 78 years. These were 60 women (85.7%) and ten men (14.3%) or a sex ratio of 0.16. Forty-nine patients (70%) had grade III of Kellgren and Lawrence scale. The average algofunctional Lequesne index was 8.48. Table 1 shows the other patient characteristics.

Assessment of Pain

The intensity of spontaneous pain was 50.46 ± 30.93 in patients receiving NSAIDs and 63.92 ± 30.07 for those who received SIAI (p = 0.0189). Fig. (1) shows the evolution of the number of patients with spontaneous pain depending on the treatment.

Fig. (1)

Evolution of the number of patients with spontaneous pain depending on the type of treatment.



At the end of follow-up, pain intensity was 6.72 ± 13.75 in the population who received NSAIDs and 17.80 ± 21.78 in the one having obtained the SIAI (p = 0.00101). Fig. (2) shows the evolution of the intensity of spontaneous pain on processing.The average intensity of pain on walking was 64.41 ± 22.61. It was 53.33 ± 22.31 in NSAID against 74.85 ± 17.55 in SIAI (P <0.0001). At the end of the treatment, they were respectively 19.11 ± 11.37, and 35 ± 30.69 (P = 0.0085). Fig. (3) shows the change in the intensity of pain on walking after treatment.

Table 2 compares the effectiveness of NSAIDs vs. SIAI for different pain and the Lequesne index.

Comments

Few studies have compared the effectiveness of oral NSAIDs and SIAI in congestive knee osteoarthritis. Our study reports an efficiency of NSAIDs on steroid infiltration after a follow-up of 42 days.

Table 2

Comparative efficacy of NSAIDs versus SIAI on pain and Lequesne index at D0 and D42.




While the general patient characteristics are similar to other African series [4Mijiyawa M. Rheumatic diseases in black Africa. Rev Rhum Ed Fr 1993; 60(6): 451-7.
[PMID: 8124280]
-6Ouédraogo DD, Séogo H, Cissé R, et al. Risk factors associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in a rheumatology outpatient clinic in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Med Trop (Mars) 2008; 68(6): 597-9.
[PMID: 19639826]
], there is difference between the two parts at inclusion which may constitute a bias; indeed, pain and functional impairment was higher in the part of patients with SIAI. Recently, a study of 32 patients with shoulder impingement syndrome showed the effectiveness of NSAIDs on the steroid injection; this efficiency is expressed in terms of gain in shoulder mobility assessed after one month of follow-up [7Min KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22(5): 595-601.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026] [PMID: 23177167]
]. However, it seems to have no significant difference between the oral NSAIDs and steroid infiltration in treating carpal tunnel syndrome [8Gurcay E, Unlu E, Gurcay AG, Tuncay R, Cakci A. Evaluation of the effect of local corticosteroid injection and anti-inflammatory medication in carpal tunnel syndrome. Scott Med J 2009; 54(1): 4-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/rsmsmj.54.1.4] [PMID: 19291926]
]. Instead, in the tendinitis of the shoulder and elbow, the efficacy of corticosteroid injections seems short [9Gaujoux-Viala C, Dougados M, Gossec L. Efficacy and safety of steroid injections for shoulder and elbow tendonitis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68(12): 1843-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.099572] [PMID: 19054817]
]. This short-term efficacy also has been reported in knee osteoarthritis [10Bellamy N, Campbell J, Robinson V, Gee T, Bourne R, Wells G. Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 18(2): CD005328.
[PMID: 15846755]
]. Indeed, from the seventh day of treatment, the number of patients with spontaneous pain in the NSAIDs part was significantly less than in patients who have received SIAI. Predictors of efficacy in the short and medium term of SIAI are not well known; however, the severity of the disease, the absence of synovitis in ultrasound, the presence of intra-articular effusion seem to lead to a more effective response [11Maricar N, Callaghan MJ, Felson DT, O’Neill TW. Predictors of response to intra-articular steroid injections in knee osteoarthritis--a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52(6): 1022-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes368] [PMID: 23264554]
, 12Chao J, Wu C, Sun B, et al. Inflammatory characteristics on ultrasound predict poorer longterm response to intraarticular corticosteroid injections in knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2010; 37(3): 650-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090575] [PMID: 20080918]
]. Our series was characterized by the severity of knee osteoarthritis (Lequesne index to 8.48) and an intra articular effusion in all patients; the superiority of infiltration lasted only one week despite that two other infiltrations have been made. These results suggest that a combination of both treatments may be performed. This could make a single steroid infiltration on the first day followed by treatment of NSAID per os. This scheme would have the advantage of reducing the risk of infection that could be linked to the last two corticosteroid injections. Other studies, including the protocol to the two described here could better appreciate the superiority of a protocol on the other and tolerance in the patient.

Fig. (2)

Evolution of the intensity of spontaneous pain depending on the type of treatment.



Fig. (3)

Evolution of pain intensity due to walking according to the type of treatment.



CONCLUSION

SIAI seems to have a brief efficiency. The oral NSAIDs have the advantage of maintaining a relief in the period compared to steroid intra-articular infiltration. Their prescription should consider the contraindications and their deleterious effects including gastrointestinal, renal, and cardiovascular effects. The difference in the average ages of the 2 groups could be a limitation of the study

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Declared none.

REFERENCES

[1] Bruyère O, Cooper C, Pelletier JP, et al. An algorithm recommendation for the management of knee osteoarthritis in Europe and internationally: a report from a task force of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Semin Arthritis Rheum 2014; 44(3): 253-63.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.05.014] [PMID: 24953861]
[2] Konai MS, Vilar Furtado RN, Dos Santos MF, Natour J. Monoarticular corticosteroid injection versus systemic administration in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis patients: a randomized double-blind controlled study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27(2): 214-21.
[PMID: 19473560]
[3] Hirsch G, Kitas G, Klocke R. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection in osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: factors predicting pain relief--a systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2013; 42(5): 451-73.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2012.08.005] [PMID: 23374502]
[4] Mijiyawa M. Rheumatic diseases in black Africa. Rev Rhum Ed Fr 1993; 60(6): 451-7.
[PMID: 8124280]
[5] Eti E, Kouakou HB, Daboiko JC, et al. Epidemiology and features of knee osteoarthritis in the Ivory Coast. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 1998; 65(12): 766-70.
[PMID: 9923045]
[6] Ouédraogo DD, Séogo H, Cissé R, et al. Risk factors associated with osteoarthritis of the knee in a rheumatology outpatient clinic in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Med Trop (Mars) 2008; 68(6): 597-9.
[PMID: 19639826]
[7] Min KS, St Pierre P, Ryan PM, Marchant BG, Wilson CJ, Arrington ED. A double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing the effects of subacromial injection with corticosteroid versus NSAID in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2013; 22(5): 595-601.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2012.08.026] [PMID: 23177167]
[8] Gurcay E, Unlu E, Gurcay AG, Tuncay R, Cakci A. Evaluation of the effect of local corticosteroid injection and anti-inflammatory medication in carpal tunnel syndrome. Scott Med J 2009; 54(1): 4-6.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/rsmsmj.54.1.4] [PMID: 19291926]
[9] Gaujoux-Viala C, Dougados M, Gossec L. Efficacy and safety of steroid injections for shoulder and elbow tendonitis: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Ann Rheum Dis 2009; 68(12): 1843-9.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/ard.2008.099572] [PMID: 19054817]
[10] Bellamy N, Campbell J, Robinson V, Gee T, Bourne R, Wells G. Intraarticular corticosteroid for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 18(2): CD005328.
[PMID: 15846755]
[11] Maricar N, Callaghan MJ, Felson DT, O’Neill TW. Predictors of response to intra-articular steroid injections in knee osteoarthritis--a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52(6): 1022-32.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kes368] [PMID: 23264554]
[12] Chao J, Wu C, Sun B, et al. Inflammatory characteristics on ultrasound predict poorer longterm response to intraarticular corticosteroid injections in knee osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 2010; 37(3): 650-5.
[http://dx.doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.090575] [PMID: 20080918]
Track Your Manuscript:


Endorsements



"Open access will revolutionize 21st century knowledge work and accelerate the diffusion of ideas and evidence that support just in time learning and the evolution of thinking in a number of disciplines."


Daniel Pesut
(Indiana University School of Nursing, USA)

"It is important that students and researchers from all over the world can have easy access to relevant, high-standard and timely scientific information. This is exactly what Open Access Journals provide and this is the reason why I support this endeavor."


Jacques Descotes
(Centre Antipoison-Centre de Pharmacovigilance, France)

"Publishing research articles is the key for future scientific progress. Open Access publishing is therefore of utmost importance for wider dissemination of information, and will help serving the best interest of the scientific community."


Patrice Talaga
(UCB S.A., Belgium)

"Open access journals are a novel concept in the medical literature. They offer accessible information to a wide variety of individuals, including physicians, medical students, clinical investigators, and the general public. They are an outstanding source of medical and scientific information."


Jeffrey M. Weinberg
(St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, USA)

"Open access journals are extremely useful for graduate students, investigators and all other interested persons to read important scientific articles and subscribe scientific journals. Indeed, the research articles span a wide range of area and of high quality. This is specially a must for researchers belonging to institutions with limited library facility and funding to subscribe scientific journals."


Debomoy K. Lahiri
(Indiana University School of Medicine, USA)

"Open access journals represent a major break-through in publishing. They provide easy access to the latest research on a wide variety of issues. Relevant and timely articles are made available in a fraction of the time taken by more conventional publishers. Articles are of uniformly high quality and written by the world's leading authorities."


Robert Looney
(Naval Postgraduate School, USA)

"Open access journals have transformed the way scientific data is published and disseminated: particularly, whilst ensuring a high quality standard and transparency in the editorial process, they have increased the access to the scientific literature by those researchers that have limited library support or that are working on small budgets."


Richard Reithinger
(Westat, USA)

"Not only do open access journals greatly improve the access to high quality information for scientists in the developing world, it also provides extra exposure for our papers."


J. Ferwerda
(University of Oxford, UK)

"Open Access 'Chemistry' Journals allow the dissemination of knowledge at your finger tips without paying for the scientific content."


Sean L. Kitson
(Almac Sciences, Northern Ireland)

"In principle, all scientific journals should have open access, as should be science itself. Open access journals are very helpful for students, researchers and the general public including people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals. The articles are high standard and cover a wide area."


Hubert Wolterbeek
(Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

"The widest possible diffusion of information is critical for the advancement of science. In this perspective, open access journals are instrumental in fostering researches and achievements."


Alessandro Laviano
(Sapienza - University of Rome, Italy)

"Open access journals are very useful for all scientists as they can have quick information in the different fields of science."


Philippe Hernigou
(Paris University, France)

"There are many scientists who can not afford the rather expensive subscriptions to scientific journals. Open access journals offer a good alternative for free access to good quality scientific information."


Fidel Toldrá
(Instituto de Agroquimica y Tecnologia de Alimentos, Spain)

"Open access journals have become a fundamental tool for students, researchers, patients and the general public. Many people from institutions which do not have library or cannot afford to subscribe scientific journals benefit of them on a daily basis. The articles are among the best and cover most scientific areas."


M. Bendandi
(University Clinic of Navarre, Spain)

"These journals provide researchers with a platform for rapid, open access scientific communication. The articles are of high quality and broad scope."


Peter Chiba
(University of Vienna, Austria)

"Open access journals are probably one of the most important contributions to promote and diffuse science worldwide."


Jaime Sampaio
(University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Portugal)

"Open access journals make up a new and rather revolutionary way to scientific publication. This option opens several quite interesting possibilities to disseminate openly and freely new knowledge and even to facilitate interpersonal communication among scientists."


Eduardo A. Castro
(INIFTA, Argentina)

"Open access journals are freely available online throughout the world, for you to read, download, copy, distribute, and use. The articles published in the open access journals are high quality and cover a wide range of fields."


Kenji Hashimoto
(Chiba University, Japan)

"Open Access journals offer an innovative and efficient way of publication for academics and professionals in a wide range of disciplines. The papers published are of high quality after rigorous peer review and they are Indexed in: major international databases. I read Open Access journals to keep abreast of the recent development in my field of study."


Daniel Shek
(Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

"It is a modern trend for publishers to establish open access journals. Researchers, faculty members, and students will be greatly benefited by the new journals of Bentham Science Publishers Ltd. in this category."


Jih Ru Hwu
(National Central University, Taiwan)


SCImago Journal Ranking

SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Browse Contents




Webmaster Contact: info@benthamopen.net
Copyright © 2020 Bentham Open